期刊文献+

加巴喷丁联合神经妥乐平治疗痛性糖尿病周围神经病变的临床观察 被引量:12

Effect of gabapendin combined with neurotropin for treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察加巴喷丁(GBP)联合神经妥乐平治疗痛性糖尿病周围神经病变(PDPN)的临床疗效。方法选择确诊PDPN的患者60例,随机分成GBP组(对照组)和GBP联合神经妥乐平组(联合组),每组30例。对照组予以GBP及其他补救用药治疗;联合组在对照组基础上,予以神经妥乐平治疗,观察治疗前和治疗后第1、2、4、6和8周的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、生活质量评分(QOL)、治疗有效率、麻木及痛觉过敏改善状况、补救镇痛药剂量的使用量及不良反应。结果治疗后第1、2、4、6和8周,两组VAS、QOL评分较治疗前改善(P<0.05),联合组较对照组效果更显著(P<0.05)。联合组镇痛效率为90.0%,与对照组镇痛效率(56.7%)比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。随着治疗时间延长,两组的麻木和痛觉过敏明显改善(P<0.05),联合组较对照组改善更明显(P<0.05)。联合组较对照组使用补救辅助镇痛药的剂量明显减少,不良反应少。结论 GBP联合神经妥乐平治疗PDPN的疗效优于单用GBP,是一种安全有效方法。 [Objective] To observe the effect of gabapendin combined with neurotropin for the treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. [Methods ] Sixty patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy were selected, then randomly divided into 2 groups: the gabapendin group (control group, n = 30), the neurotropin combined with gabapendin group (combination group, n = 30). The control group received gabapendin and other remedy drugs. The combination group received neurotropin combined with the same administration of gabapentin as the control group. The visual analogue scale (VAS), the quality of life (QOL), the effective rate of pain relieving, the improvement of numb and hyperpathia, administration of remedy drug and side effects were evaluated before treatment and 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks after treatment. [Results] The VAS was significantly declined and the QOL was significantly improved in both groups after the treatment (P 〈 0.05), which were more significant in the combination group than in the control group (P〈 0.05). The effective rate was 90.0% in the combination group, while 56.7% in the control group (P〈0.05). The numb and hyperpathia were significantly improved in both groups (P〈 0.05), and the improvement was more significant in the combi- nation group than in the control group (P〈 0.05). The administration dose of remedy drug was lower and side effects were fewer in the combination group. [Conclusion] Gabapendin combined with neurotropin is more effective than single administration of gabapendin for the treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. It is a safe and effective treatment.
作者 丁远远 姚鹏
出处 《中国现代医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第23期86-90,共5页 China Journal of Modern Medicine
关键词 神经妥乐平 加巴喷丁 痛性糖尿病周围神经病 视觉模拟评分 neurotropin gabapendin painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy visual analogue scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1JENSEN TS, BARON R, HAANPAA M, et al. A new definition of neuropathic pain[J]. PAIN, 2011, 152(10): 2204-2205.
  • 2GUAN Y, DING X, CHENG Y, et al. Efficacy of pregabalin for peripheral neuropathic pain: results of an 8-week, flexible-dose, double-blind, placebocontrolled study conducted in China[J]. Clin Ther, 2011, 33(2): 159-166.
  • 3ZIEGLER D. Painful diabetic neuropathy: advantage of novel drugs over old drugs[J]. Diabetes Care, 2009, 32(2): 414-419.
  • 4THOMAS BM, FARQUHAR-SMITH P. Gabapentin enacarbil ex- tended release for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia in adults[J]. Ther Cliu Risk Manag, 2013, 9: 469-475.
  • 5ARGOFF CE, KATZ N, BACKONJA M. Treatment of posther- petic neuralgia: a review of therapeutic options[J]. J Pain Symp- tom Manage, 2004, 28(4): 396-411.
  • 6SIMA AA, ZHANG W. Mechanisms of diabetic neuropathy: axon dysfunction[J]. Handb Clin Neurol, 2014, 126: 429-442.
  • 7MENG FY, ZHANG LC, LIU Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of gabapentin for treatment of postherpetie neuralgia: a meta-analy- sis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2014, 80(5): 556-567.
  • 8KHADEM T, STEVENS V. Therapeutic options for the treatment of postherpetie neuralgia: a systematic review[J]. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmaeother, 2013, 27(3): 268-283.
  • 9KUKKAR A, BALI A, SINGH N, et al. Implications and mechanism of action of gibapentin in neuropathic pain[J]. Arch Pharm Res, 2013, 36(3): 237-251.
  • 10YEH CY, CHUNG SC, TSENG FL, et al. Biphasic effects of chronic intrathecal gabapentin administration on the expression of protein kinase C gamma in the spinal cord of neuropathic pain rats[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan, 2011, 49(4): 144-148.

二级参考文献5

  • 1蔡军,倪家骧,孙海燕,武百山.脊髓电刺激系统植入改良术式的临床应用[J].中国骨伤,2007,20(z1):9-10. 被引量:1
  • 2Siddall PJ,Taylor DA, McClelland JM, et al. Pain report and the relationship of pain to physical factors in the first 6 months following spinal cord injury. Pain, 1999,81 (1-2) : 187-197.
  • 3Raichle KA,Hanley M,Jensen MP,et al. Cognitions,coping,and social environment predict adjustment to pain in spinal cord injury. J Pain,2007,8(9) :718-729.
  • 4Ullrich PM ,Jensen MP, Loeser JD, et al. Pain intensity, pain interference and characteristics of spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 2008,46 (6) :451-455.
  • 5Horiuchi H, Ogata T, Morino T, et al. Serotonergic signaling inhibits hyperalgesia induced by spinal cord damage. Brain Res, 2003,963 (1-2) :312-320.

共引文献6

同被引文献95

引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部