艺术公共性的对应问题——试论顾丞峰的艺术私密性

Correspondence of Public Nature of Art: On Gu Chengfeng's Viewpoint on Privacy Nature of Art

艺术家——艺术品——观众,只有这三方的有序连接,才能把创作与审美完美的对应起来。有观众的参与,艺术就已经具有了公共性。把艺术的私密性看做是艺术家个人的人生经历更为恰当。个人经历只是对艺术作品影响的一个因素(也可能是重要的或决定性的因素),对探讨艺术家和作品风格有一定意义,如果它与艺术的公共性没有对应关系,艺术的私密性也将毫无意义。

Only artist, artwork and audience are connected orderly will creation and aesthetics be matched perfectly. Art has its public nature once audience is involved. It＇s better to treat privacy nature of art as artist＇s personal experiences. These experiences will be（or might be important or crucial） one of the factors which influence creation of artwork. They are significant when artists and their art styles are involved; however, they are not corresponding to public nature of art. Therefore, the study of privacy nature of art is also meaningless.