期刊文献+

A New Approach to Learn the Equivalence Class of Bayesian Network

A New Approach to Learn the Equivalence Class of Bayesian Network
下载PDF
导出
摘要 It's a well-known fact that constraint-based algorithms for learning Bayesian network(BN) structure reckon on a large number of conditional independence(C1) tests.Therefore,it is difficult to learn a BN for indicating the original causal relations in the true graph.In this paper,a two-phase method for learning equivalence class of BN is introduced.The first phase of the method learns a skeleton of the BN by CI tests.In this way,it reduces the number of tests compared with other existing algorithms and decreases the running time drastically.The second phase of the method orients edges that exist in all BN equivalence classes.Our method is tested on the ALARM network and experimental results show that our approach outperforms the other algorithms. It's a well-known fact that constraint-based algorithms for learning Bayesian network(BN) structure reckon on a large number of conditional independence(C1) tests.Therefore,it is difficult to learn a BN for indicating the original causal relations in the true graph.In this paper,a two-phase method for learning equivalence class of BN is introduced.The first phase of the method learns a skeleton of the BN by CI tests.In this way,it reduces the number of tests compared with other existing algorithms and decreases the running time drastically.The second phase of the method orients edges that exist in all BN equivalence classes.Our method is tested on the ALARM network and experimental results show that our approach outperforms the other algorithms.
出处 《Journal of Donghua University(English Edition)》 EI CAS 2015年第2期257-260,共4页 东华大学学报(英文版)
关键词 Bayesian network(BN) structure learning conditional independence(CI) test Equivalence equivalence Bayesian independence constraint skeleton causal undirected running probabilistic
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Pearl J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference [ M ]. San Francisco, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1988.
  • 2Friedman N. Inferring Cellular Networks Using Probabilistie Graphical Models [ J]. Science, 2004, 303(5659) : 799-805.
  • 3Cowell R G, David .P, Lanritzen S L, et al. ProbabilisfieNetworks and Expert Systems [ M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1999.
  • 4Russell S J, Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence: a Modern Approach [M]. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2009.
  • 5Spines P, Giymour C, Scheines R. Causation, Prediction, and Search [M]. 2nd ad. London, England: The MIT Press, 2001.
  • 6Pearl J. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  • 7Vermas T, Pearl J. Equivalence and Synthesis of Causal Models [ C]. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, New York, USA, 1990: 220-227.
  • 8Chang J, Greiner R, Kelly J, et al. Learning Bayesian Networks from Data: an Information-Theory Based Approach [ J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2002, 137(1/2): 43-90.
  • 9Mahdi R, Mezey J. Sub-local Constraint-Based Learning of Bayesian Networks Using a Joint Dependence Criterion [ J ]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2013, 14(1): 1563-1603.
  • 10Friedman N, Nachman I, Peer D. Learning Bayesian Network Structure from Assive Datasets: the " Sparse Candidate " Algorithm [ C]. Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Stockholm, Sweden, 1999: 206-215.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部