期刊文献+

汉化修正版自我护理能力评估量表在老年住院患者中应用的信效度评价 被引量:7

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of the appraisal of Self-Care Agency Scale-Revised in the elderly hospitalized patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨汉化的修正版自我护理能力评估量表(ASAS-R-C)在老年住院患者中应用的信效度.方法 方便抽取辽宁省锦州市2所三级甲等医院的420例老年住院患者,对其进行ASAS-R-C调查,运用SPSS17.0和AMOS17.0分析其在受调查人群中的信效度.结果 ASAS-R-C的Cronbach α系数为0.78,重测信度为0.83;内容效度指数(CVI)为0.97,x/df=2.34、残差均方和平方根(RMR)=0.02、渐进残差均方和平方根(RMSEA)=0.07、拟合优度指数(GFI)=0.93、调整拟合优度指数(AGFI)=0.91、非规范拟合指数(TLI)=0.93、增值拟合指数(IFI)=0.92、比较拟合指数(CFI)=0.94、简约拟合指数(PGFI)=0.65,均达到适配标准.结论 ASAS-R-C信效度良好,可用于评估老年住院患者的自我护理能力,为其提供一种新的简便的测评工具. Objective To explore the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Self-Care Agency Scale-Revised (ASAS-R-C) in application of elderly hospitalized patients.Methods Totally 420 elderly inpatients were recruited from two tertiary first-class hospital in Jinzhou,Liaoning province and were investigated using ASAS-R-C.SPSS 17.0 and AMOS 17.0 software were used to analyze the reliability and validity of the scale.Results The three-factor 15-item ASAS-R-C had a Cronbach's alpha (α) of 0.78and the retest reliability was 0.83.The content validity index (CVI) was 0.97,x2/df=2.34,root mean square residual (RMR)=0.02,root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.07,goodness-offit index (GFI)=0.93,adjusted goodness-of-fit indes (AGFI)=0.91,Tacker-Lewis index (TLI)=0.93,incremental fit index (IFI)=0.92,comparative fit index (CFI)=0.94,parsimonious goodness-of-fit index (PGFI)=0.65,the ASAS-R-C had a good fit.Conelusions The ASAS-R-C is a short,reliable and valid instrument to measure self-care ability among the old inpatients,and further study is needed before being widely used.
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 2015年第24期1856-1859,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
关键词 自我护理 住院病人 量表 信度 效度 Self care Inpatients Scale Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1曾光霞.中国人口老龄化新特点及影响[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2014,20(2):136-139. 被引量:26
  • 2陈蓉,郑娜.我国老年人自我护理的现状[J].全科护理,2011,9(10):914-915. 被引量:9
  • 3Evers GC,Isenberg MA, Philipsen H,et al. Validity testing of theDutch translation of the appraisal of the self- care agency A.S.A. - scale[j].IntJNurs Stud,1993,30(4):331-342.
  • 4Fok MS, Alexander MF, Wong TK, et al. Contextualising theappraisal of Self - care Agency Scale in Hong Kong [j].ContempNurse,2002,12(2) :124-134.
  • 5Sousa VD, Zauszniewski JA, Zeller RA, et al. Factor analysis of theappraisal of Self-care Agency Scale in American adults with diabetesmellitus[j]. Diabetes Educ,2008,34( 1):98-108.
  • 6Smith KJ,Pag6V,Gari 6 py G, et al. Self-rated diabetes control in aCanadian population with type 2 diabetes : associations with healthbehaviours and outcomes [J].Diabetes Res Clin Pract,2012,95(1):162-168.
  • 7Rodr Iguez G, Mdelos A, Arredondo HE,et al. Self - care agencyability and factors related to the agency in people with heart failure ofMedellin (Colombia) [j]. Enfermer !a Global,2013,12 (30): 183 -195.
  • 8Sousa VD,Zauszniewski JA,Ber^quist- Beringer S, et al. Reliability,validity and factor structure of the Appraisal of Self - Care Agency Scale-Revised(ASAS-R)[j]j Eval Clin Pract,2010,16(6) : 1031-1040.
  • 9郭丽娜,高涵,郭启云,刘堃.修正版自我护理能力评估量表汉化后的信效度评价[J].中国实用护理杂志,2014,30(30):64-66. 被引量:115
  • 10王珊珊,刘彦慧,Shake Ketefian,黄春平.中文版老年住院患者跌倒风险评估量表的信效度研究[J].中华护理杂志,2012,47(10):927-929. 被引量:65

二级参考文献102

共引文献1423

同被引文献71

引证文献7

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部