期刊文献+

SF-36量表与QLQ-C30量表在老年癌症病人生活质量评估中的应用及其相关性研究 被引量:173

Application and correlation study of SF-36 scale and QLQ-C30 scale in assessment of quality of life of elderly patients with cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨简明健康问卷(SF-36)与癌症病人生活质量测定量表核心量表(QLQ-C30)对老年癌症病人生活质量评估效果并对两量表的相关性进行研究。[方法]采用SF-36与QLQ-C30对进行化疗的109例老年癌症病人的生活质量进行评估并对测试结果的相关性进行分析。[结果]两量表中与角色相关的功能量表,如SF-36的躯体角色功能(RP)、情绪角色功能(RE)和QLQ-C30的角色功能(RF)是两量表中表现最差的功能量表。QLQ-C30的经济压力(FI)和疲乏(FA)是表现最突出的两方面。两量表中反映相同性质的功能量表间存在较好的相关性。[结论]两量表均能在一定程度上反映癌症病人的生活质量,其评估结果是可比和互补的。 Objective:To probe into the evaluation effect of SF -36 and QLQ- C30 for the quality of life of elderly patients with cancer and study the correlation between the two scales. Methods: SF - 36 and QLQ - C30 were used to evaluate the quality of life of 109 elderly patients with cancer, and to analyze the correlation between them. Results: Function scale related to the role such as role physical(RP),role emotional(RE) of SF- 36 and role function(RF) of QLQ- C30 were the function scale with the most poor performance in both scales. Economic impact (FI) and fatigue (FA) of QLQ -C30 were the two most prominent aspects. There was a good cor- relation between the two scales,which had same functional scale reflected same nature. Conclusion: Both scales can reflect the quality of life of cancer patients to a certain extent. The evaluation results are comparable and complementary.
出处 《护理研究(下旬版)》 2015年第8期2968-2972,共5页 Chinese Nursing Researsh
关键词 老年病人 癌症 生活质量 SF-36 QLQ-C30 elderly patients cancer quality of life SF- 36 QLQ- C30
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Smith BD,Smith GL, Hurria A,etal. Future of cancer incidence in the United States: Burdens upon an aging, changing nation[J]. J Clin Oncol,2009,27(17) :2758 - 2765.
  • 2Ware JE,Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36 - item short - form health survey (SF- 36): Conceptual framework and item selection[J]. Med Care,1992,30(6):473 -483.
  • 3Hays RD,Sherhourne CD,Mazel R. User's manual for the Medi- cal Outcomes Study (MOS) core measures of health - related quality of life[M]. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1995 : 1.
  • 4张磊,徐德忠,黄久仪,李良寿.SF-36量表中文版的应用及分级截断点选择的研究[J].中华流行病学杂志,2004,25(1):69-73. 被引量:364
  • 5Pickard AS, Neary MP, Cella D. Estimation of minimally impor- tant differences in EQ- 5D utility and VAS scores in cancer [J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2007,5 : 70.
  • 6Schipper H, Clinch J, McMurray A, et al. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: The Functional Living Index - Cancer: De- velopment and validation[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1984,2 (5) :472 - 483.
  • 7Cella DF,Tulsky DS,Gray G,et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure[J]. J Clin Onco1,1993,11(3) :570 - 579.
  • 8Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et a l. The European Or- ganization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ - C30: A quality - of - life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst,1993,85(5):365 -376.
  • 9Pompili C, Brunelli A, Xium6 F, et al. Prospective external conver- gence evaluation of two different quality - of - life instruments in lung resection patients[J]. Eur J Cardio - Thorac Surg, 21311,40 (1) :99 - 105.
  • 10Patrick DL,Deyo RA. Generic and disease- specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life[J]. Med Care, 1989,27 (3) :S217 - S232.

二级参考文献4

共引文献659

同被引文献1786

引证文献173

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部