期刊文献+

替格瑞洛在急诊PCI术中应用的疗效及安全性观察 被引量:12

Curative effect and safety of ticagrelor administrated in emergency percutaneous coronary intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨替格瑞洛在急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术中应用的疗效及安全性。方法2013年1月至2014年3月在我院诊断为急性心肌梗死并急诊行PCI术的患者共192例,随机分为替格瑞洛组(n=105)和氯吡格雷组(n=87),对两组患者的临床资料进行统计学分析,对比住院期间及随访3月不稳定性心绞痛、心肌梗死、死亡等主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)发生率及出血、呼吸困难等不良事件发生率。结果两组的基本情况无统计学差异(P>0.05);术后随访3个月发现MACCE事件发生率替格瑞洛组明显低于氯吡格雷组(P<0.05),出血发生率两组无统计学差异(P>0.05);氯吡格雷组中有6例再发急性冠脉综合征(ACS),均再次行PCI干预,改用替格瑞洛术前负荷剂量180 mg,术后90 mg2/日,分别于术前及后24 h查血栓弹力图,结果显示ADP抑制率及ADP诱导的血小板-纤维蛋白凝块强度(MAADP)应用替格瑞洛后均优于应用替格瑞洛前(P<0.05)。结论替格瑞洛较氯吡格雷在我国人群急诊PCI术中具有更好的疗效及安全性。 Objective To discuss the curative effect and safety of ticagrelor administrated in emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods The patients (n=192) with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergone emergency PCI were chosen from Jan. 2013 to Mar. 2014, and randomly divided into ticagrelor group (n=105) and clopidogrel group (n=87). The clinical data of patients were analyzed statistically. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE, including unstable angina pectoris, myocardial infarction and death), bleeding and dyspnea were compared between 2 groups during hospital stay and after follow-up for 3 m. Results The general conditions had no statistical difference between 2 groups (P〉0.05). After follow-up for 3 m, the incidence of MACCE was significantly lower in ticagrelor group than that in clopidogrel group (P〈0.05), and incidence of bleeding had no statistical difference between 2 groups (P〉0.05). There were 6 cases with recurrent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in clopidogrel group, and then they were given secondary PCI and ticagrelor replacing clopidogrel (preoperative dose of 180 mg and 90 mg three times a day after PCI). These patients were given thrombelastogram examination before and 24 h after PCI, and the outcomes showed that ADP inhibitory rate and ADP-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength (MAADP) were all higher after ticagrelor administration (P〈0.05). Conclusion Ticagrelor has higher curative effect and safety than clopidogrel in population undergone emergency PCI.
出处 《中国循证心血管医学杂志》 2015年第4期533-536,共4页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Cardiovascular Medicine
关键词 替格瑞洛 急诊PCI 急性心肌梗死 急诊PCI Ticagrelor Emergency percutaneous coronary intervention Acute myocardial infarction
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Bonello L,Tantry US,Marcucci R,et al. Consensus and future directions on the definition of high on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2010,56(12):919-33.
  • 2Steg PG,Harrington RA,Emanuelsson H,et al. Stent thrombosis with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes:an analysis from the prospective,randomized PLATO trial [J]. Circulation,2013,128(10):1055-65.
  • 3Abtahian F,Yonetsu T,Vergallo R,et al. Ticagrelor immediately prior to stenting is associated with smaller residual thrombus in patients with acute coronary syndrome[J]. Int J Cardiol,2013,168(3):3099-101.
  • 4James S,Akerblom A,Cannon CP,et al. Comparison of ticagrelor, the first reversible oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist, with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes:Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial[J]. Am Heart J,2009,157(4):599-605.
  • 5Wallentin L,Becker RC,Budaj A,et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009.361:1045 -57.
  • 6Cannon CP,Harrington RA,Jarnes S,et al. Comparison of ticagrelor with clopidogrel in patients with a planed invasive strategy for acute coronary syndromes (PLATO): a randomised double-blind study[J]. Lancet,2010,375(9711):283-93.
  • 7Gurbel PA,Bliden KP,Butler K,et al. Randomized double-blind assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease:the ONSET/OFFSET study[J]. Circulation, 2009,120(25):2577-85.
  • 8Becker RC,Bassand JP,Budaj A,et al. Bleeding complications with the P2Y12 receptor antagonists clopidogrel and ticagrelor in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) triM[J]. Eur Heart J,2011,32(23):2933-44.
  • 9王丽丽,李群,康林,李馨,郭晓宁,张涛.应用血栓弹力图评估ACS患者替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷抗血小板的疗效[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志,2014,6(3):281-284. 被引量:29
  • 10Nylander S,Femia EA,Scavone M,et al. Ticagrelor inhibits human platelet aggregation via adenosine in addition to P2Y12 antagonism[J]. J Thromb Haemost, 2013,11 (10): 1867-76.

二级参考文献22

  • 1Yusuf S,Zhao F,Mehta SR,et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to asprin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segmenl elevation[J]. N Engl J Med,2001,345(7):494-502.
  • 2Gorog DA,Sweeny JM,Fuster V. Antiplatelet drug resistance.Part 2:laboratory resistance to antiplatelet drugs-fact or artifact[J]. Nat Rev Cardiol,2009,6(5):365-73.
  • 3Cattaneo M. Resistance to anti-platelet agents[J]. Thromb Res,2011,127(Suppl 3):S61-3.
  • 4Cattaneo M. Aspirin and clopidogrehefficacy,safety,and the issue of drug resistance[J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,2004,24(11): 1980-7.
  • 5Patrono C,Coller B,Dalen JE,et al. Platelet-active drugs:the relationships among dose, effectiveness,and side effects[J]. Chest,1998,114(5 Suppl):470S-88S.
  • 6Wallentin L,Becker RC,Budaj A,et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes[J]. N Engl J Med,2009,361 (11):1045-57.
  • 7Swallow RA,Agarwala RA,Dawkins KD,et al. Thromboelastograrphy: potential bed side tool to assess the effects of antiplatelet therapy[J]. Platelets,2006,17(6):385-92.
  • 8Hobson AR,Petley GW,Dawkins KD,et al. A novel fifteen minute test for assessment of individual time-dependent clotting responses to aspirin and elopidogrel using modified thrombel astography[J]. Platelets,2007,18(7):497-505.
  • 9Tantry US,Bliden KP, Gurbel PA. Overestimation of platelet aspirin resistance detection by thrombelastograph platelet mapping and validation by conventional aggregometry using arachidonic acid stimulation[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2005,46(9): 1705-9.
  • 10Bliden KP,Tantry US,Zaman K,et al. High platelet reactivity is a risk factor for post-discharge ischemic complications following elective coronary stenting[J]. J Am Coil Car diol,2005,47:33A.

共引文献32

同被引文献126

引证文献12

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部