期刊文献+

美国医疗无效纠纷解决机制及其对我国的启示 被引量:3

Enlightenment of American Medical Futility Dispute Resolution Mechanism to China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 医疗无效和医疗无效纠纷现已成为美国卫生保健领域内最具争议性的问题之一,其核心为医疗无效纠纷的解决。经过约三十年的发展,美国已构建了一个多主体参与的、立体的医疗无效纠纷解决机制,主要包括预先医疗指示、医院医疗无效政策的披露、医院伦理委员会机制、更换机制、单边行动机制、诉讼机制和其他一些非正式纠纷解决机制。美国医疗无效纠纷解决机制中对医生伦理权利和患者权利的限制与平衡、纠纷解决过程中的多主体参与和医院伦理委员会的作用,对我国的研究有重要的启示意义。 Medical futility and medical futility disputes have become one of the most contentious issues in American health care, and the core is the resolution of the invalid disputes. After about 30 years of development, the United States has established multi-bodies participated and cubic dispute resolution mechanisms for medical futility disputes, including advance directives, disclosure of the hospital medical futility policies, hospital ethics committee mechanism, replacement mechanism, unilateral action mechanism, litigation mechanism and other in- formal dispute resolution mechanisms. The restricting and balancing between physician's ethics right and patient's fight and multi-bodies participation and the role of the hospital ethics committees in American medical futility dispute resolution mechanisms are of great significance for China.
作者 龚学德
出处 《医学与法学》 2015年第4期31-37,共7页 Medicine and Jurisprudence
基金 贵州医科大学院基金项目"患者知情同意权研究"(项目编号:2014合同字第004号) 贵州省教育厅规划项目"私权主体的环境公益诉权研究"(项目编号:黔教社发[2013]419)的阶段性成果
关键词 医疗无效 医疗无效纠纷 纠纷解决机制 美国 medical futility medical futility dispute dispute resolution mechanism the United States
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Daniel Robert Mordarski.Medical Futility: Has Ending Life Support Become The Next "Pro-choice~Right to Life" Debate? Cleveland State Law Review[J]. 1993,751-787.
  • 2Thaddeus M. Pope, Medical Futility Statutes: No S(tfe Harbor to Unilaterally Stop Life-Sustaining Treatment [J]. Tennessee Law Review, Fall, 2007, 1-81,at 8, 42-50, 66-70.
  • 3Thaddeus Mason Pope.Dispute Resolution Mechanisms for Intractable Medical Futility Disputes[J]. New York Law School Law Review. 2013/2014. 347-368,at 351-365.
  • 4Emily Ramshaw, Bills Challenge Care Limits for Termi- nal Patients: Some Say 10 Days to Transfer Isn't Enough BeforeTreatment Ends[N]. Dallas Morning News, Feb. 15, 2007 at 1A.
  • 5Jonathan M. Breslin et al., Top 10 Health Care Ethics Challenges Facing the Public.: Views of Toronto Bioethicists, [J]. BMC Med Ethics. 2005; 6: 5. at 12.
  • 6Thomas Wm. Mayo, Health Care Law[J]. SMU Law Re- view, Summer 2000,1101-1123, at 1107-1108.
  • 7Black's Law Dictionary 45 (Bryan A. Gal~aer ed., 8th ed., West 2004).
  • 8Judy A. Clausen.Making The Case For A Model Mental Health Advance Directive Statute [J]. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law & Ethics. Winter 2014,1-65,at 6.
  • 9Katie Rinkus.The Pregnancy Exclusion In Advarvc.e Directives:Are Women's Constitutional Rights Being Violated?[J]. Public Interest Law Reporter, Spring 2014,94-99,at 97.
  • 10Paul T. Menzel.Advance Directives,Dementia, And Eli- gibility For Physician-Assisted Death [J].New York Law School Law Review. 2013/2014,321-345.at 342.

二级参考文献6

共引文献12

同被引文献40

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部