期刊文献+

爱欲与城邦:科里奥兰纳斯的命运 被引量:2

Polis and Eros:Coriolanus's Fortune
原文传递
导出
摘要 科里奥兰纳斯热爱自身的高贵即"勇武"的德性更甚于城邦本身,并以城邦为实现自身高贵之工具;但在城邦特别是城邦平民看来,"勇武"无论多么高贵,终不过是保障城邦和平或人民安全的工具。双方均自视为城邦的主人,城邦就此分裂。科里奥兰纳斯公然蔑视大众,竟被后者逐出家园;为复仇他不顾一切,甚至舍弃亲情,几乎毁灭了自己的祖国。然而,爱欲的力量不可战胜:受其感召,化身嗜血"孤龙"的罗马之子科里奥兰纳斯最终实现了城邦(同时也是自身灵魂)的和平,以死亡为代价完成了自己作为城邦爱人和高贵战士的德性与命运。 The Roman hero Coriolanus loves his Virtue or valor more than his polis,which leads to the hatred of the plebeians,who believe that they are the city and that Virtue is nothing but an instrument used to safeguard peace of the city; hence an irreconcilable 'class war'within the polis. Banished from Rome as a result of the tribunes' plot,Coriolanus becomes 'a lonely dragon'thirsting for revenge. Indeed,he would destroy Rome,were it not for the love for his mother,his wife and his little son. In the triple mirror of love,he recognizes his former self,i. e. Rome's lover. Together with this recognition follows a new resolution and the revolution of his fate: he is killed as a traitor by his enemy- ally,whereby he redeems his former identity and fulfils his virtue,i. e. love for his polis.
作者 张沛
出处 《国外文学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期27-36,156-157,共10页 Foreign Literatures
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1A. C. Bradley, Shakespearean Tragedy (The Macmillan Press Ltd. , 1974), p. 65.
  • 2A. P. Rossiter, "Political Tragedy", in Shakespeare : Corio- lanus (SC), a casebook edited by B. A. Brockman (Lon- don: MacMillan Education Ltd. , 1988), p. 155.
  • 3A. C. Bradley, Character and the Imaginative Appeal of Tragedy in Coriolanus, in SC, p. 53.
  • 4G. Wilson Knight, The Imperial Theme ( London : Methuen &Co. Ltd., 1965), p. 190.
  • 5Aristotle, Ethics, 1155a.
  • 6G. K. Hunter,The Last Tragic Heroes, in SC, p. 160.
  • 7Plutarch' s Lives, IV, Coriolanus, III, trans. Bernadotte Perrin (London: William Heinemann Ltd. , 1967), p. 123.
  • 8Kenneth Burke : "The Delights of Faction", in SC,, p. 170.
  • 9Plutarch' s Lives, IV, Coriolanus, III, trans. Bernadotte Perrin ( London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1967 ), p. 123.
  • 10Sigmund Freud, Civilization and Its Discontents, trans. James Strachey (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1962), p. 48. Cf. Lucretius: De rerum natura, V. LL. 958-1029.

共引文献2

同被引文献20

  • 1莫运平.莎士比亚《科利奥兰纳斯》的价值论释义[J].戏剧文学,2006(11):26-30. 被引量:2
  • 2马基雅维利.《君主论·李维史论》,第325页,吉林出版集团,2011年版.
  • 3普鲁塔克.《希腊罗马名人传》[M].商务印书馆,1990年版.第190页,第192页.
  • 4马基雅维利.《君主论·李维史论》,潘汉典,薛军,译,吉林出版集团,2010年,第335-336页.
  • 5普鲁塔克:《希腊罗马名人传》,席代岳译,吉林出版集团2009年版,第1卷,400—435页.
  • 6Plutarch ' s Li Vol. IV, trans. Bernadotte Perrin, Loeb Classical Library (Cam- bridge: Havard University Press, 1959), 152 -153.
  • 7《科利奥兰纳斯》.
  • 8陆谷孙:《(科利奥兰纳斯)的悲剧真谛:官能失调》,载《莎士比亚十讲》,复旦大学出版社2005年版,184-201页.
  • 9朱生豪等译:《莎士比亚全集》第4卷,人民文学出版社1995年版.
  • 10Barbara L. Parker, Plato's Republic and Shakespeare' s Rome ( Newark: Delaware Press, 2004 ) , 54 -73.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部