期刊文献+

基于不同商品类型的在线评论感知有用性的实证 被引量:14

下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章以信息经济学和知识采纳模型为理论基础,从评论内容特征和评论者特征两方面出发,探讨不同商品类型在线评论感知有用性影响因素,并构建在线商品评论感知有用性影响因素模型。以亚马逊网站上体验型和搜索型两种类型商品的评论数据进行理论模型的实证分析。结果表明,商品类型对于在线评论的感知有用性具有显著的调节作用,对于体验型商品评论长度、评论者可信度和极端评论与感知有用性为正相关关系,评论时效与感知有用性为负相关关系;对于搜索型商品评论长度、评论者可信度与感知有用性呈现正相关关系,而极端评论和评论时效与感知有用性不相关。
出处 《统计与决策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第16期108-111,共4页 Statistics & Decision
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(41174007 71271126) 教育部博士点专项科研基金资助项目(20120078110002)
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Susan M. Mudambi, David S. What Makes A Help-Ful Online Re- view? A Study of Customer Reviews on Amazon.com[J]. MIS Quarter- ly, 2010, 1(34).
  • 2Park D H, Lee J, Han I. The Effect of On-Line Consumer Reviews on Consumer Purchasing Intention: The Moderating Role of Involvement [J]. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2007, 11(4).
  • 3Sussman S W, Siegal W S. Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption[J]. Information Sys- tems Research,2003,14(1).
  • 4Pavlou P, Dimoka A. The Nature and Role of Feed-Back Text Com- ments in Online Marketplaces:Implications for Trust Building, Price Premiums, and Seller Differentiation[J]. Information Systems Re- search, 2006,17(4).
  • 5Eisend M. Two-Sided Advertising: A Meta-Analysis[J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2006 ,(23).
  • 6殷国鹏.消费者认为怎样的在线评论更有用?——社会性因素的影响效应[J].管理世界,2012,28(12):115-124. 被引量:192
  • 7郝媛媛.在线评论对消费者感知与购买行为影响的实证研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学.2010.
  • 8Fogg B J, Tseng. Credibility and Computing Technology[J]. Communi- eations of Assoeiation for Computing Machinery, 1999, 42(5).

二级参考文献59

  • 1殷国鹏,莫云生,陈禹.利用社会网络分析促进隐性知识管理[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2006,46(z1):964-969. 被引量:94
  • 2Angst, C. M. and Agarwal, R., 2009, "Adoption of Elec- tronic Health Records in the Presence of Privacy Concerns: The Elaboration Likelihood Model and Individual Persuasion", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33, pp.339-370.
  • 3Bhattacherjee, A. and Sanford, C., 2006, "Influence Pro- cesses for Information Technology Acceptance: An Elaboration Likelihood Model", MIS Quarterly, Vol.30, pp.805-825.
  • 4Brown, J., Broderick, A. J. and Lee, N., 2007, "Word of Mouth Communication within Online Communities: Conceptualiz- ing the Online Social Network", Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol.21, pp.2-20.
  • 5Cao, Q., Duan, W. and Gan, Q., 2011, "Exploring Deter- minants of Voting for the "Helpfulness" of Online User Reviews: A text Mining Approach", Decision Support Systems, Vol. 50, pp.511-521.
  • 6Chaiken, S., 1980, "Heuristic versus Systematic Informa- tion Processing and the Use of Source versus Message Cues in Persuasion" , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.39, pp.752-766.
  • 7Chen, C. C. and Tseng, Y. D., 2011, "Quality Evalua- tion of Product Reviews Using an Information Quality Frame- work", Decision Support Systems, Vol.50, pp.755-768.
  • 8Chen, Pei-Yu, Dhanasobhon, S. and Smith, M. D., 2009, "All Reviews Are Not Created Equal: The Disaggregate Impact of Reviews on Sales on Amazon.Com", Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University.
  • 9Chen, Y. and Xie, J., 2008, "Online Consumer Review: Word-of-Mouth as A New Element of Marketing Communication Mix" ,Management Science, Vol. 54, pp.477-491.
  • 10Cheung, M. K. and Thadani, D. R., 2012, "The Effec- tiveness of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Communication: A Litera- ture Analysis and Integrative Model", Decision Support Systems, Vol.51, Article in Press.

共引文献191

同被引文献148

引证文献14

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部