期刊文献+

控制剖宫产率对高龄初产母婴结局影响的研究 被引量:1

Pregnancy outcomes in advanced maternal age pregnancies after taking measures to reducing caesarean section rate
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨采取控制剖宫产率相关措施对高龄初产妇母婴结局的影响。方法回顾性分析1062例高龄初产孕产妇临床资料,2014年分娩的490例高龄初产妇作为研究组,2013年分娩的高龄初产妇572例作为对照组,比较两组妊娠并发症、分娩方式、产后出血率、新生儿窒息率。结果 1两组胎膜早破、妊娠期糖尿病、前置胎盘、子宫肌瘤、妊娠期高血压疾病、早产、巨大儿发生率差异无显著性(P>0.05);2研究组和对照组剖宫产率分别为51.63%、68.88%,两者比较差异有显著性(P<0.0001);3阴道助产率研究组与对照组分别为7.96%、4.72%,差异有显著性(P=0.02);4研究组产后出血率、输血率、新生儿窒息率与对照组相比,差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论综合孕期和产时管理,将高龄初产孕妇剖宫产率控制在较合理的水平是可能的。 Objective To compare pregnancy outcomes in advanced maternal age pregnancies after taking measures to reducing caesarean section rate. Method A total of 1062 pregnant women aged 35 years or older who gave birth in beijing haidian district maternal and children healthcare hospital from 2013 to 2014 were retrospectively studied. 490 Pregnant women aged 35 years and over delivered in 2014 were included in study group and those 572 patients delivered in 2013 were included in the control group. Pregnant complications, delivery mode, postpartum hemorrhage rate,neonatal asphyxia rate were compared in both groups. Result ①No statistically significant difference was ob- served in the frequency of premature rupture of membrane, gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta previa, uterine my- oma,hypertensive disorders, preterm birth, or macrosomia in both groups; ②The caesarean section rate in study group was statistically significantly lower than that in the control group (51.63 % vs 68.88 %, P〈0. 0001 ) ;③ The instrumental delivery rate was significantly higher in study group than that in the control group (7.96% vs g. 72%, P=0.02) ;④ No statistically significant difference was observed in the frequency of postpartum hemorrhage, blood transfusion,neonatal asphyxia(P〉0.05 ). Conclusion With the measures of strengthening prenatal and intrapartum care, it is possible to reducing the caesarean section rate in advanced maternal aged pregnancies.
出处 《中国临床医生杂志》 2015年第8期39-41,共3页 Chinese Journal For Clinicians
关键词 剖宫产率 高龄 结局 阴道助产 Caesarean section rate Advanced maternal age Outcome Instrumental delivery
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Benli AR, Benli NC, Usta AT, et al. Effect of maternal age on pregnancy outcome and cesarean delivery rate[ J ]. J Clin Med Res, 2015,7(2) :97-102.
  • 2Carolan M, Frankowska D. Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome : a review of the evidence [ J ]. Midwifery, 2011, 27(6) :793-801.
  • 3Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM, et al . World Health Organization Global Survey on Maternal and Preinatal Health Research Group:Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in A- sia:the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal heahh2007- 2008 [ J. Lancet ,2010,375 ( 9 ) :490-498.
  • 4侯磊,李光辉,邹丽颖,李长东,陈奕,阮焱,王欣,贾朝霞,张为远.全国剖宫产率及剖宫产指征构成比调查的多中心研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2014,0(10):728-735. 被引量:483
  • 5Fulence D, Aas E, Botten G, et al. Why do some pregnant women prefer caesaren? The influence of parity, delivery experiences and fear[ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2011 (205) :45.
  • 6Arrieta A. Health reform and cesareans in the private sector: the experience of Peru [ J ]. Health Policy, 2011 (99) : 124-130.
  • 7Jacquemyn Y, Martens E, Martens G. Pregnancy at late premeno- pausal age: outcmne of pregnancies at 45 years and older in Flan- ders, Belgium [ J ]. J Obstet Gynaeco1,2014,34 ( 6 ) :479-481.
  • 8Laopaiboon M, Lumbiganon P, Intarut N,et al. Advanced maternal age and pregnancy outcomes: a multicountry assessment J ]. BJOG,2014,121 ( Suppl 1 ) :49-56.
  • 9唐江萍,邓娟,姜丽.近5年上海市嘉定区户籍与流动孕妇剖宫产相关因素的分析[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2013,14(1):63-64. 被引量:2
  • 10黄醒华.对剖宫产术的思考[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2003,19(7):385-388. 被引量:892

二级参考文献60

  • 1汪萍,苏悦,周学勤.妊娠期妇女对分娩方式选择的调查分析[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2006,14(5):80-81. 被引量:9
  • 2李娟清,石一复.七省市剖宫产率调查分析[J].中华围产医学杂志,2006,9(5):306-308. 被引量:63
  • 3陈乔珠,何静妍,谢静颖.300例社会因素剖宫产术分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(4):411-413. 被引量:24
  • 4张坚,李萍,谢静燕,徐友娣,玄英华.5年剖宫产手术指征变迁的因素分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2007,23(1):60-61. 被引量:137
  • 5American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Com-mittee Opinion No. 394, December 2007. Cesarean delivery on mater-nal request[ J] . Obstet Gynecol,2007 ,110(6) :1501.
  • 6Lumbiganon P,Laoppaiboon M,Gtilmezoglu M, et al. Method of de-livery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey onmaternal and perinatal health 2007 -08 [ J]. Lancet,2010 ( 375 ):490-499.
  • 7Daltveitak,Tollanes M C, Pihlsttrom H, et al. Cesarean delivery andsubsequent pregnancies[ J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2008,111(6) :1327-1334.
  • 8Rebecca N,Baergen. Manual of Benirschke and Kanfmann’ s pa-thology of the human placenta( Repos) [ M]. Berlin: Springer-Ver-lag,2008.129.
  • 9Guise J,McDonagh M,Hash im a J, et al . Vaginal Birth After Ce-sarean (VBAC) . Eviden ce Report /Technology Assessm ent No.71 ( Prepared by the Oregon Health & Science University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-97-0018 ) [ J].AHRQ Publication,2003(3) :18.
  • 10McMahon MJ. Vaginal birth after prerious cesarean delivery [ J].Obstetrics and Gynecology,2010,116(1) :203-212.

共引文献1388

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部