期刊文献+

不同力学激励对骨重建数值模拟的影响 被引量:7

The effect of different mechanical stimuli on numerical simulation of bone remodeling
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究采用应变能密度、等效应力、等效应变3种不同力学激励对骨重建数值模拟结果的影响。方法建立股骨近端的二维有限元模型,基于力学稳态理论的重建控制方程并结合有限元法,分别用3种不同力学激励模拟股骨近端的内部结构及密度分布,并与CT数据计算得到的骨密度值进行定量分析比较。结果 3种力学激励模拟得到的重建结果均能反映出股骨近端的主要特征结构,但采用等效应力作为激励时得到的股骨密度曲线图的趋势和数值都与CT图像数据更为一致。结论在骨重建力学调控机制中,应力可能起主导作用。准确预测和模拟骨重建过程将对矫形外科、骨伤治疗、人工假体的优化和个体化设计等临床实践提供理论依据。 Objective To study the effect of three different kinds of mechanical stimuli (i. e. strain energy density, equivalent stress and equivalent strain) on numerical simulation of bone remodeling. Methods A two-dimension- al finite element model of the proximal femur was constructed. Based on the mechanostat theory and finite ele- ment method, the inner structure of the proximal femur and its density distributions under the three different stimu- li were predicted. Then the simulation results were compared quantitatively with calculation results obtained from CT images. Results The predicted density distributions on the proximal femur under different stimuli were all well matched with the real structure of the proximal femur. By comparing the values and shapes of the calculated bone density curves, the predictions from the model using equivalent stress as mechanical stimuli were mostly consist- ent with the CT images. Conclusions The equivalent stress might play a leading role in mechano-regulation algo- rithms of bone remodeling. The accurate prediction of bone remodeling process will provide a theoretical basis for clinical practices such as orthopedic surgery, treatment of bone diseases and personalized design and optimiza- tion of prosthesis.
出处 《医用生物力学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期299-303,共5页 Journal of Medical Biomechanics
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2011CB711000) 国家自然科学基金项目(30500122)
关键词 骨重建 数值模拟 股骨 力学激励 有限元分析 Bone remodeling Numerical simulation Femur Mechanical stimuli Finite element analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1程亮,王冬梅,王成焘.骨重建数值仿真中的控制方程[J].医用生物力学,2007,22(4):417-422. 被引量:8
  • 2Mullender MG, Huiskes R, Weinans H. A physiological approach to the simulation of bone remodeling as a self- organizational control process [ J]. J Biomech, 1994, 27 (11) : 1389-1394.
  • 3P~rez MA, Fornells P, Doblar~ M, et aL Comparative analysis of bone remodelling models with respect to com- puterised tomography-based finite element models of bone [J]. Comput Meth Biomech Eng, 2009, 13(1) : 71-80.
  • 4Hambli R, Benhamou CL, Jennane R, et aL Combined finite element model of human proximal femur behaviour considering remodeling and fracture r-J]. IRBM, 2013, 34 (2) : 191-195.
  • 5Frost HM. Bone "mass" and the "mechanostat" : A pro- posal [J]. Anat Rec, 1987, 219(1) : 1-9.
  • 6Lin CL, Lin YH, Chang SH. Multi-factorial analysis of vari- ables influencing the bone loss of an implant placed in the maxilla: Prediction using FEA and SED bone remodeling algorithm [J]. d Biomech, 2010, 43(4) : 644-651.
  • 7Behrens BA, Nolte I, Wefstaedt P, et aL Numerical inves- tigations on the strain-adaptive bone remodelling in the periprosthetic femur: Influence of the boundary conditions [J]. Biomed Eng Online, 2009, 8(1) : 1-9.
  • 8Beaupr~ GS, Orr TE, Carter DR. An approach for time-de- pendent bone modeling and remodeling-Theoretical devel- opment [J]. J Orthop Res, 1990, 8(5) : 651-661.
  • 9Doblare M, Garcfa JM. Application of an anisotropic bone- remodelling model based on a damage-repair theory to the analysis of the proximal femur before and after total hip replacement [J]. J Biomech, 2001, 34(9): 1157-1170.
  • 10Cowin SC, Hart RT, Balser JR, et aL Functional adapta- tion in long bones: Establishing in vivo values for surface remodeling rate coefficients [J]. J Biomech, 1985, 18(9) : 665 -671.

二级参考文献37

  • 1Cowin SC, Hedgedus DH. Bone remodeling: A theory of adaptive elasticity[J]. J Elasticity, 1976 ,(6): 313-326.
  • 2Huiskes R, Weinans H, et al. Adaptive bone remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis [J]. J Biomech, 1987, 20 (11/12): 1135-1150.
  • 3Huiskes R, Boeklagen Ro Mathematical shape optimization of hip prosthesis design [J]. J Biomech, 1989, 22(8-9): 793- 804.
  • 4Weinans H, Huiskes R, et al. A hypothesis concerning minimal bone density threshold levels as final stages of bone remodeling[J]. Trans 36th orthop Res Soc, 1990,(15): 78.
  • 5Huiskes R, Weinans H, et al. Validation of strain-adaptive bone remodeling analysis to predict bone morphology around noncemented THA[J]. Trans 37th orthop. Res.Soc. 1991, (16):5.
  • 6Weinans H, Hufskes R, Grootenboer HJ. The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling stimulation models [J]. J Biomechanics, 1992, (25): 1425-1441.
  • 7Mullender MG, Huiskes R, Weinans H. A physiological approach to the simulation of bone remodeling as a self organizational control process [J]. J Biomech, 1994, 27(11): 1389-1394.
  • 8Carter DR, Orr TE, Pyhrie DP. Relationships between loading history and femoral cancellous bone architecture [J]. J Biomech, 1989, 22(3): 231-244.
  • 9Beaupre GS, Orr TE, Carter DR. An approach for time - dependent bone modeling and remodeling application: A preliminary remodeling simulation[J]. J Orthopaedic Res, 1990, 8(5): 662-670.
  • 10Jacobs CR. Numerical simulation of bone adaptation to mechanical loading [M]. Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Stanford University, 1994.

共引文献7

同被引文献44

  • 1严世贵,何荣新,陈维善,吴浩波,余世策.全髋关节置换前后股骨应力变化的有限元分析[J].中华骨科杂志,2004,24(9):561-565. 被引量:62
  • 2林剑浩,吕厚山,寇伯龙,袁燕林,冯传汉.股骨头假体置换术后假体周围骨量变化的观察[J].中华骨科杂志,1995,15(8):494-496. 被引量:21
  • 3申才良,唐天驷,杨惠林.同种皮质骨融合支架的研制及临床应用[J].临床骨科杂志,2007,10(4):302-305. 被引量:3
  • 4马宗民,李淑娴,朱兴华.基于Wolff定律的各向异性骨再造模型[J].中国生物医学工程学报,2007,26(6):908-911. 被引量:8
  • 5Campbell DG, Li P. Sterilization of HIV with irradiation: Relevance to infected bone allografts [ J ]. Aust N Z J Surg, 1999, 69(7) : 517-521.
  • 6Rozen B, Brosh T, Salai M, et al. The effects of prolonged deep freezing on the biomechanical properties of osteochondral allografts [ J ]. Cell Tissue Bank, 2009, 10 (1): 27-31.
  • 7Hamer A, Strachan JR, Black MM, et al. Biomechanical properties of cortical allograft bone using a new method of bone strength measurement-A comparison of fresh, fresh- frozen and irradiated bone [ J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 1996, (3) : 363-368.
  • 8Suarez LS, Richmond JC. Overview of procurement, pro- cessing, and sterilization of soft tissue allografts for sports medicine [J]. Sports Med Arthrosc, 2007, 15(3) : 106-113.
  • 9Pelker RR, Friedlaender GE, Markham TC. Biomechanical properties of bone allografts I J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1983, 174: 54"57.
  • 10Ilgenli T, Dundar N, Ilhan Kal B. Demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft and platelet-rich plasma vs platelet-rich plas- ma alone in infrabony defects: A clinical and radiographic evaluation [J]. Clin Oral Invest, 2007, 11(1): 51-59.

引证文献7

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部