期刊文献+

肺癌化疗患者PICC健康教育指标体系的构建 被引量:7

Construction of PICC health education index system of lung cancer chemotherapy patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 构建肺癌化疗患者PICC健康教育指标体系。方法 成立课题研究小组,采用文献回顾、理论分析、半结构式访谈和Delphi法,编制专家咨询问卷,采用现场发放、信函或电子邮件的形式对23名专家进行2轮意见咨询。结果 2轮专家咨询问卷的有效回收率分别是86.96%和100%,专家权威系数是0.88,一级指标的满分比为0.91~0.98,变异系数为0.11~0.15,二级指标的满分比为0.65~1.00,变异系数为0.04~0.18。结论 最终构建了由3项一级指标、24项二级指标、100项具体条目组成的肺癌化疗患者PICC健康教育指标体系,能更全面、准确地反映健康教育的知识需求、沟通和交际需求,具有更好的系统性、针对性和实用性,为今后开展有针对性的健康教育和指导提供了依据。 Objective To construct PICC health education index system of lung cancer chemotherapy patients. Methods A research group was set up, literature review and interviews, and adopting Delphi method to deliver two rounds of questionnaire consultation among 23 experts in the form of field distribution, letter or email. Results The effective recovery rates of questionnaire were respectively 86.96 % and 100.00 %. The experts coefficient was 0.88, the full score rate of first- grade indexes was 0. 91--0. 98, the coefficient of variation was 0.11--0.15. The full score rate of the second - grade indexes was 0.65 - 1.00, the coefficient of variation was 0.04-- 0.18. Conclusion The index system is composed of 3 first - grade indexes, 25 second - grade indexes and 100 specific content. It accurately reflects the needs of health education knowledge, communication and interpersonal needs. Meanwhile, it's systematic, targeted and practical. And it provides the basis for the health education and guidance in the future.
作者 薛静 唐瑶
出处 《实用临床医药杂志》 CAS 2015年第16期23-26,共4页 Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
关键词 肺癌 PICC 健康教育 DELPHI法 lung cancer PICC health education Delphi method
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献110

共引文献301

同被引文献62

  • 1常艳丽,钱敏.探讨肺癌化疗患者健康教育需求及护理对策[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2019,0(87):315-316. 被引量:1
  • 2吕晓涓,黄海波,董震.不同病理类型老年肺癌患者外周血血清肿瘤标志物表达差异[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(7):1971-1972. 被引量:14
  • 3Quoix E,LemariéE.Epidemiological novelties in lung cancer[J].Rev Mal Respir,2011,28(8):1048-1058.
  • 4Jemal A,Bray F,Cebter M M,et al.Global cancer statistics[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2011,61(2):69-90.
  • 5Barry A E,Chaney B,Piazza-Gardner A K,et al.Validity and reliability reporting practices in the field of health education and behavior a review of seven journals[J].Health Educ Behav,2014,41(1):12-18.
  • 6Cheng H G,Mc Bride O,Phillips M R.Relationship between knowledge about the harms of smoking and smoking status in the 2010 global adult tobacco china survey[J].Tobacco Control,2014,24(1):54-61.
  • 7Cleary A,Dowling M.Knowledge and attitudes of mental health professionals in Ireland to the concept of recovery in mental health:a questionnaire survey[J].J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs,2009,16(6):539-545.
  • 8Golden S D,Earp J A.Social ecological approaches to individuals and their contexts:twenty years of health education&behavior health promotion interventions[J].Health Educ Behav,2012,39(3):364-372.
  • 9宿静.实施健康教育的影响因素及对策[J].护理实践与研究,2010,7(3):112-113. 被引量:14
  • 10陈万青,张思维,邹小农.中国肺癌发病死亡的估计和流行趋势研究[J].中国肺癌杂志,2010,13(5):488-493. 被引量:516

引证文献7

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部