摘要
从诠释学角度来看,何晏为《论语集解》所作的注文中具有经学和玄学两个向度。在诠释方法上,何晏《论语》注一方面具有注重训诂的经学向度;另一方面则有义理阐发的玄学向度。在诠释视域上,何晏《论语》注一方面继承了经学经以致用的诠释视域;另一方面则开创了本体论背景下的天人合一这一玄学诠释视域。也正因如此,何晏主导完成的《论语集解》是一部处于"经玄之际"的注经著作。
In the perspective of hermeneutics, there are both Confucian Classics study dimension and Neo-Taoism dimension in the note by He Yan in the Collected Explanations of the Analects. For the purpose of hermeneutic methods, He Yan's note has a Classic dimension which pays attention to the word intent on one hand, and on the other hand, it also has a Neo:Taoism dimension which attaches importance to articulate meaning. In the her- meneutic horizon, He Yan' s note inherited the realistic inclination of Classics study; meanwhile his annotation also inaugurated the Neo-Taoism hermeneutic horizon by discussing harmony between man and nature under the background of ontology. He Yan' s Collected Explanations of the Analects is exactly an annotation monograph which lies between Confucian Classics study and Neo-Taoism.
出处
《许昌学院学报》
CAS
2015年第4期30-34,共5页
Journal of Xuchang University
关键词
诠释方法
经学向度
玄学向度
诠释视域
本体论
经玄之际
Hermeneutic method
Classics dimension
Neo-Taoism dimension
Hermeneutic horizon
Ontology
between Classics study and Neo-Taoism