期刊文献+

高通量测序技术与传统染色体核型分析技术在胎儿畸形染色体分析中的比较 被引量:5

The comparison of the high-throughput sequencing technology and the conventional karyotyping technology in chromosome analysis of fetal malformation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较高通量测序技术与传统染色体核型分析技术在胎儿畸形染色体诊断中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析28例产前诊断胎儿畸形病例,经腹胎儿脐带穿刺取样同时进行传统染色体核型分析及高通量测序技术分析。结果高通量测序技术异常核型检出率为82.1%(23/28),传统染色体核型分析技术异常核型检出率为7.2%(2/28),高通量测序技术检测出的染色体微缺失及微重复样本解读与畸形一致性较低。结论在胎儿畸形染色体诊断中传统染色体核型分析技术有局限性,高通量测序技术分析结果中异常片段样本解读与胎儿畸形相关性不强。 Objective:Comparison of the high-throughput sequencing technology and conventional karyotyping technology analysis application value in chromosome analysis of fetal malformation. Methods:A retrospective analysis of 28 cases of prenatal diagnosis of fetal malformation. Transabdominal fetal umbilical cord puncture sampling at the same time carry out an analysis of the high-throughput sequencing technology and conventional karyotyping technology.Results:The abnormal karyotyping detection rate of the high-throughput sequencing technology was 82.1%(23/28),the abnormal karyotyping detection rate of conventional karyotyping technology was 7.2%(2/28). Detection of high-throughput sequecing technology chromosome microdeletion and microrepeated sample interpretation and malformation of lower consistency. Conclusions:The abnormal fetal chromosomal karyotyping analysis in the traditional diagnostic techniques had limitations,The correlation of abnormal fragments of highthroughput sequencing analysis results of sample interpretation with fetal malformation was not strong.
出处 《中国优生与遗传杂志》 2015年第8期10-12,共3页 Chinese Journal of Birth Health & Heredity
关键词 畸形 胎儿 核型分析 高通量测序 超声 Malformation Fetal Karyotyping analysis High-throughput sequencing Ultrasonography
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Hundahl SA, FIeming ID, Fremgen AM, et al.A national cancer data base report on 53856 cases of thyroid carcinoma treated in the US, 1985-1995[J].Cancer, 1998, 83 (12) :12638-2648.
  • 2Jiang F, Ren J, Chert F, et al. Noninvasive Fetal Trisomy (NIFTY) test :an advanced noninvasive prenatal diagnosis methodology for fetal autosomal and sex chromosomal aneuploidies[J]. BMC Med Genomics, 2012, 5:57.
  • 3Bianchi DW, Platt LD, Goldberg JD, et al.Genome-wide fetal aneuploidy detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2012,119 (5) :890-901.
  • 4Hackshaw AK, Wald NJ.Assessment of the value of reporting partial screening results inprenatal screening for Down ' s syndrome[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2001,21:445-447.
  • 5Nisli K, Oner N, Candan S, et al.Congenital heart disease in children with Down s syndrome :turkish experience of 13 years[J]. ACTA Cardio, 2008,63 (5) :585-589.
  • 6卢丹,陈欣林,杨小红,朱霞,宋婕萍,徐淑琴.超声诊断胎儿畸形与染色体检测结果的对比研究[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2011,20(3):272-273. 被引量:8
  • 7Anne M.Slavotinek Novel microdeletion syndromes detected by chromosome Mieroarrays[J].Hurn Genet, 2008,124 A-17.
  • 8Goumy C, Gouas L, Tchirkov A, et al.Familial deletion llq14.3-q22.1 without apparent phenotypic consequences :A haplosufficient 8.5 Mb region[J].Am J Med Genet Part A, 2008, 146A :2668-2672.

二级参考文献1

  • 1Hackshaw AK, Wald NJ. Assessment of the value of reporting partial screening results in prenatal screening for Down ' s syndrome. Prenat Diagn ,2001,21:445-447.

共引文献7

同被引文献41

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部