期刊文献+

直肠癌患者脉管内癌栓与临床病理因素及预后的关系 被引量:1

The Relationship of Rectal Carcinoma Patient's Intra-angiologia Cancer-embolus with Clinical Pathological Factors and Prognosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 为探讨直肠癌患者脉管内癌栓与临床病理因素的关系及其对疾病预后的影响,回顾分析2007年1月至2009年12月我科行手术治疗的382例直肠癌患者的临床及病理资料,分析脉管内癌栓与肿瘤浸润深度、组织分化程度、淋巴结转移程度的关系,并比较脉管内癌栓阳性组和阴性组患者术后3年、5年生存率的差异。结果显示,382例患者中,脉管内癌栓阳性56例。直肠癌患者脉管内癌栓的存在与肿瘤浸润深度、组织分化程度、淋巴结转移程度有关,P〈0.05;与性别、年龄无关,P〉0.05。脉管内癌栓阳性组患者术后3年、5年生存率明显低于脉管内癌栓阴性组,P〈0.05。结果表明,脉管内癌栓是直肠癌患者非常重要的预后因素,应给予高度关注。 In order to explore the relationship of rectal carcinoma patient's intra-angiologia cancer-embolus with clinical pathological factors,and its influence on prognosis of disease,authors retrospectively analyzed the clinical and pathological data of 382 cases who had received surgery from 2007-01 to 2009-12,investigated the relationship of intra-angiologia cancer-embolus with neoplasm infiltration depth, tissue differentiation degree,and lymph node metastasis, and compared the differences postoperation of 3-year, 5-year survival rate between cancer-embolus positivity group and cancer-embolus negativity group.As results,in 382 cases 56 were cancer-embolus positive; rectal carcinoma patient's existing intra-angiologia cancer-embolus was related to their neoplasm infiltration depth, tissue differentiation degree, and metastasis degree of lymph node( P〈0.05) ,but not to sex and age( P〉0.05) ~postoperation 3-year and 5-year survival rate of cancer-embolus positivity group was significantly lower than that of cancer-embolus negativity group( P〈0.05).Results show that intra-angiologia cancer-embolus is an important factor related to the prognosis of patients with rectal carcinoma, which should be noticed.
出处 《中国肛肠病杂志》 2015年第6期10-11,共2页 Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
关键词 直肠癌 脉管内癌栓 临床病理因素 生存率 Rectal carcinoma Intra-angiologia cancer-embolus Clinical pathological factor Survival rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献30

  • 1王华.癌周静脉癌栓和肝转移对大肠癌术后生存率的影响[J].肿瘤研究与临床,2004,16(4):270-271. 被引量:2
  • 2李斌,吴令英,李淑敏,章文华,张蓉,马绍康.子宫内膜癌的预后影响因素分析[J].癌症,2004,23(9):1085-1088. 被引量:31
  • 3Steiner E, Eicher O, Sagemuller J, et al. Multivariate independent prognostic factors in endometrial carcinoma: A clinicpathologic study in 181 patients: 10 years experience at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Mainz University [J]. Int J Cancer, 2003, 13:197- 203.
  • 4Mikuta JJ. International federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging of endometrial cancer 1988 [J]. Cancer, 1993, 71:1460- 1463.
  • 5Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, et al. Cancer statistics, 2000 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2000, 50:7- 33.
  • 6Takeshima N, Hirai Y, Yano K, et al. Ovarian metastasis in endometrial carcinoma [J]. Gynecol Oncol. 1998, 70:183- 187.
  • 7Mariani A, Webb MJ, Keeney GL, et al. Hematogenous dissemination in corpus cancer [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2001, 80:233- 238.
  • 8Mariani A, Webb MJ, Keeney GL, et al. Surgical stageⅠ endometrial cancer: Predictors of distant failure and death [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2002, 87:274- 280.
  • 9Mariani A, Webb MJ, Keeney GL, et al. Role of wide/radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in endometrial cancer with cervical involvement [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2001, 72- 80.
  • 10Cirisano FD, Robboy SJ, Dodge RK, et al. The outcome of stageⅠⅡ clinically and surgically staged papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancers when compared with endometrioid carcinoma [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2000, 77:55- 65.

共引文献48

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部