期刊文献+

Effects of different irrigation methods on micro-environments and root distribution in winter wheat fields 被引量:10

Effects of different irrigation methods on micro-environments and root distribution in winter wheat fields
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The irrigation method used in winter wheat fields affects micro-environment factors, such as relative humidity(RH) within canopy, soil temperature, topsoil bulk density, soil matric potential, and soil nutrients, and these changes may affect plant root growth.An experiment was carried out to explore the effects of irrigation method on micro-environments and root distribution in a winter wheat field in the 2007–2008 and 2008–2009 growing seasons.The results showed that border irrigation(BI), sprinkler irrigation(SI), and surface drip irrigation(SDI) had no significant effects on soil temperature.Topsoil bulk density, RH within the canopy, soil available N distribution, and soil matric potential were significantly affected by the three treatments.The change in soil matric potential was the key reason for the altered root profile distribution patterns.Additionally, more fine roots were produced in the BI treatment when soil water content was low and topsoil bulk density was high.Root growth was most stimulated in the top soil layers and inhibited in the deep layers in the SDI treatment, followed by SI and BI, which was due to the different water application frequencies.As a result, the root profile distribution differed, depending on the irrigation method used.The root distribution pattern changes could be described by the power level variation in the exponential function.A good knowledge of root distribution patterns is important when attempting to model water and nutrient movements and when studying soil-plant interactions. The irrigation method used in winter wheat fields affects micro-environment factors, such as relative humidity(RH) within canopy, soil temperature, topsoil bulk density, soil matric potential, and soil nutrients, and these changes may affect plant root growth.An experiment was carried out to explore the effects of irrigation method on micro-environments and root distribution in a winter wheat field in the 2007–2008 and 2008–2009 growing seasons.The results showed that border irrigation(BI), sprinkler irrigation(SI), and surface drip irrigation(SDI) had no significant effects on soil temperature.Topsoil bulk density, RH within the canopy, soil available N distribution, and soil matric potential were significantly affected by the three treatments.The change in soil matric potential was the key reason for the altered root profile distribution patterns.Additionally, more fine roots were produced in the BI treatment when soil water content was low and topsoil bulk density was high.Root growth was most stimulated in the top soil layers and inhibited in the deep layers in the SDI treatment, followed by SI and BI, which was due to the different water application frequencies.As a result, the root profile distribution differed, depending on the irrigation method used.The root distribution pattern changes could be described by the power level variation in the exponential function.A good knowledge of root distribution patterns is important when attempting to model water and nutrient movements and when studying soil-plant interactions.
出处 《Journal of Integrative Agriculture》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2015年第8期1658-1672,共15页 农业科学学报(英文版)
基金 the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51109214,31101074 and 51309211) the National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China(2011BAD32B) the Basic Scientific Research Foundation of National Non-Profit Scientific Institute of China(BSRF201303)
关键词 border irrigation root profile distribution sprinkler irrigation surface drip irrigation field micro-environment winter wheat border irrigation,root profile distribution,sprinkler irrigation,surface drip irrigation,field micro-environment,winter wheat
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Adeoye K B. 1986. Physical changes induced by rainfall in the surface layer of an Alfisol, northern Nigeria. Geoderma, 39, 59-66.
  • 2Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, Smith M 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56.
  • 3United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. Bai W M, Li L H. 2003. Effect of irrigation methods and quota on root water uptake and biomass of alfalfa in the Wulanbuhe sandy region of China. Agricultural Water Management, 62, 139--148.
  • 4Bathke G R, Cassel D K, Hargrove W L, Porter P M. 1992. Modification of soil physical properties and root growth response. Soil Science, 154, 316-329.
  • 5Benjamin J G, Nielsen D C. 2006. Water deficit effects on root distribution of soybean, field pea and chickpea. Field Crops Reseach, 97,248-253.
  • 6Breazeale L E, Mcgeorge W T. 1953. Influence of atmospheric humidity on root growth. Soil Science, 76, 361-366.
  • 7Cavero J, Medina E T, Pug M, Martinez-Cob A. 2009. Sprinkler irrigation changes maize canopy microclimate and crop water status, transpiration, and temperature. Agronomy Journal. 101. 854-864.
  • 8Fabi,o A, Madeira M, Steen E, Ktterer 3", Ribeiro C, Arajo C. 1995. Development of root biomass in an Eucalyptus globulus plantation under different water and nutrient regimes. Plant and Soft, 188-169, 215-223.
  • 9Ferguson H, Boatwright G O. 1968. Effects of environmental factors on the development of the crown node and adventitious roots of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Agronomy Journal, 60,258-260.
  • 10Jackson L E, Bloom A J. 1990. Root distribution in relation to soil nitrogen availability in field-grown tomatoes. Plant and Soil. 128. 115-126.

同被引文献131

引证文献10

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部