期刊文献+

伽玛刀联合紫杉醇治疗高级别胶质瘤的临床研究 被引量:1

Combined gamma knife with paclitaxel for recurrent high grade glioma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨伽玛刀联合紫杉醇治疗术后复发的高级别胶质瘤的临床疗效及不良反应。方法将73例胶质瘤术后患者分为联合治疗组(35例)和伽玛刀组(38例)。联合治疗组在伽玛刀治疗前2h静脉滴注紫杉醇100mg/m^2,伽玛刀组仅行伽玛刀治疗。所有患者伽玛刀治疗方案均采用50%剂量曲线包绕病灶,病灶中心剂量28~32Gy,周边剂量14~16Gy。结果联合治疗组与伽玛刀组近期有效率分别为37.1%和39.5%,无统计学差异(P=0.838);近期疾病控制率分别为97.1%和81.6%,两组间比较有统计学差异(P=0.041);生活质量改善率分别为42.9%和42.1%,无统计学差异(P=0.948);两组中改善及稳定的患者比例分别为97.1%和76.3%(P=0.010);无进展生存率分别为57.1%和34.2%,两组间比较有统计学差异(P=0.049);总生存率分别为17.1%和13.2%,组间比较无统计学差异(P=0.634)。治疗不良反应发生率两组比较无统计学差异(P=0.258)。结论伽玛刀联合紫杉醇治疗能提高术后复发高级别胶质瘤患者的近期疾病控制率,提高临床症状稳定改善率,并能延长患者无进展生存期,改善生活质量。 Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of combined gamma knife with paclitaxel therapy for reoccurred high grade glioma. Methods Seventy three patients were randomized into two groups:35 patients received gamma knife plus paclitaxel therapy, 38 patients received gamma knife therapy only. Paclitaxel was given by intravenous drip at a dose of 100mg/m2.Gamma knife therapy was adopted at 50% isodose of 14~16Gy. Results The CR+PR rate and disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) in gamma knife plus paclitaxel group and gamma knife therapy group were 37.1%vs 39.5%(P=0.838) and 97.1%vs 81.6%(P=0.041), respectively. KPS improvement rate, steady rate, progression- free survival (PFS) rate in gamma knife plus paclitaxel group and gamma knife therapy group were 42.9%vs 42.1%(P=0.948), 97.1%vs 76.3%(P=0.010) and 57.1%vs 34.2%(P=0.049), respectively. Overal survival rate in gamma knife plus paclitaxel group and gamma knife therapy group was 17.1%and 13.2%(P=0.634) respectively. There was no significant difference in side effect rate between two groups (P=0.258). Conclu-sion Gamma knife plus paclitaxel therapy can increase disease control rate, prolong PFS time and improve the quality of life in reoccurred high grade glioma patients.
出处 《浙江医学》 CAS 2015年第13期1136-1138,1174,共4页 Zhejiang Medical Journal
基金 浙江省医药卫生科技项目(2010KYA023)
关键词 伽玛刀 紫杉醇 放射增敏 胶质瘤 Gamma knife surgery Paclitaxel Radiosensitizer Glioma
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Nishihori T, Shirato H, Aoyama H, et al. Three-dimensional con- formal radiotherapy for astrocytic tumor involving the eloquent area in children and young adults[J]. J Neurooncol, 2002, 60(2): 177-183.
  • 2Kemper E M, Boogerd W, Thuis I, et al. Modulation of the blood- brain barrier in oncology: therapeutic opportunities for the treat- ment of brain tumours[J].Cancer Treat Rev,2004,30(5):415-423.
  • 3曾四元,李隆玉,舒宽勇,潘玫,李汉萍,罗兵.同步放化疗和单纯放疗治疗ⅡB~ⅢB期宫颈癌的疗效比较[J].癌症,2008,27(9):942-946. 被引量:15
  • 4Therasse P, Arbuck S G, Eisenhauer E A, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Or- ganization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Can- cer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada[J].J Natl Cancer Inst,2000,92(3):205-216.
  • 5Pozza F, Colombo F, Chierego G, et al. Low-grade astrocytomas: treatment with unconventionally fractionated external beam stero- tactic radiation therapy[J].Radiology, 1989,171 (2):565-569.
  • 6Kida Y, Yoshimoto M, Hasegawa T. Radiosurgery for intracranial gliomas[J].Prog Neurol Surg,2009,22:122-128.
  • 7Szeifert G T, Prasad D, Kamyrio T, et al. The roe of Gamma Knife in the management of cerebral astrocytomas[J].Prog Neurol Surg, 2007,20:150 - 163.
  • 8孙时斌,刘阿力.伽玛刀治疗脑胶质瘤临床疗效的随访分析[J].中华神经外科杂志,2000,16(6):391-393. 被引量:19
  • 9Elaimy A L, Mackay A R,Lamoreaux W T,et aI.Clinical outcomes of gamma knife radiosurgery in the salvage treatment of patients with recurrent high-grade gfioma[J].World Neurosurg,2013,80(6): 872-878.
  • 10Slichenmyer W J,Von Hoff D D.Taxol: a new and effective an- ti-cancer drug[J].Anticancer Drugs, 1991,2(6):519-530.

二级参考文献14

  • 1曾四元,李隆玉,李汉萍.BP和TP方案同步放化疗治疗中晚期宫颈癌疗效比较[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2005,12(2):151-154. 被引量:10
  • 2王迎选,现代立体定向放射治疗学,1999年,132页
  • 3王忠诚,神经外科学,1998年,424页
  • 4Whitney C W, Sause W, Bundy B N, et al. Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage Ⅱ B-ⅣA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study [J]. J Clin Oncol, 1999,17(5):1339-1348.
  • 5Rose P G, Bundy B N, Watkins E B, et al. Concurrent cisplatin-baaed radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 1999,340 (15) : 1144-1153.
  • 6Keys H M, Bundy B N, Stehman F B, et al. Cisplatin, radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage I B cervical carcinoma [J]. N Engl J Med, 1999,340(15): 1154-1161.
  • 7Morris M, Eifel P J, Lu J, et al. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 1999,340(15) : 1137-1143.
  • 8Peters W A, Liu P Y, Barrett R J, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early stage cancer of the cervix [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2000,18(8) : 1606-1613.
  • 9Liebmann J, Cook J A, Fisher J, et al. In vitro studies of Taxol as a radiation sensitizer in human tumor cells [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1994,86 (6) : 441-446.
  • 10Moore K N, Herzog T J, Lewin S, et al. A comparison of cisplatin/paclitaxel and carboplatin/paclitaxel in stage Ⅳ B, recurrent or persistent cervical cancer [J]. Gyneool Oncol, 2007,105(2) : 299-303.

共引文献32

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部