期刊文献+

Sensitivity of Near Real-time MODIS Gross Primary Productivity in Terrestrial Forests Based on Eddy Covariance Measurements 被引量:1

Sensitivity of Near Real-time MODIS Gross Primary Productivity in Terrestrial Forests Based on Eddy Covariance Measurements
下载PDF
导出
摘要 As an important product of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer(MODIS), MOD17A2 provides dramatic improvements in our ability to accurately and continuously monitor global terrestrial primary production, which is also significant in effort to advance scientific research and eco-environmental management. Over the past decades, forests have moderated climate change by sequestrating about one-quarter of the carbon emitted by human activities through fossil fuels burning and land use/land cover change. Thus, the carbon uptake by forests reduces the rate at which carbon accumulates in the atmosphere. However, the sensitivity of near real-time MODIS gross primary productivity(GPP) product is directly constrained by uncertainties in the modeling process, especially in complicated forest ecosystems. Although there have been plenty of studies to verify MODIS GPP with ground-based measurements using the eddy covariance(EC) technique, few have comprehensively validated the performance of MODIS estimates(Collection 5) across diverse forest types. Therefore, the present study examined the degree of correspondence between MODIS-derived GPP and EC-measured GPP at seasonal and interannual time scales for the main forest ecosystems, including evergreen broadleaf forest(EBF), evergreen needleleaf forest(ENF), deciduous broadleaf forest(DBF), and mixed forest(MF) relying on 16 flux towers with a total of 68 site-year datasets. Overall, site-specific evaluation of multi-year mean annual GPP estimates indicates that the current MOD17A2 product works highly effectively for MF and DBF, moderately effectively for ENF, and ineffectively for EBF. Except for tropical forest, MODIS estimates could capture the broad trends of GPP at 8-day time scale for all other sites surveyed. On the annual time scale, the best performance was observed in MF, followed by ENF, DBF, and EBF. Trend analyses also revealed the poor performance of MODIS GPP product in EBF and DBF. Thus, improvements in the sensitivity of MOD17A2 to forest productivity require continued efforts. As an important product of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer(MODIS), MOD17A2 provides dramatic improvements in our ability to accurately and continuously monitor global terrestrial primary production, which is also significant in effort to advance scientific research and eco-environmental management. Over the past decades, forests have moderated climate change by sequestrating about one-quarter of the carbon emitted by human activities through fossil fuels burning and land use/land cover change. Thus, the carbon uptake by forests reduces the rate at which carbon accumulates in the atmosphere. However, the sensitivity of near real-time MODIS gross primary productivity(GPP) product is directly constrained by uncertainties in the modeling process, especially in complicated forest ecosystems. Although there have been plenty of studies to verify MODIS GPP with ground-based measurements using the eddy covariance(EC) technique, few have comprehensively validated the performance of MODIS estimates(Collection 5) across diverse forest types. Therefore, the present study examined the degree of correspondence between MODIS-derived GPP and EC-measured GPP at seasonal and interannual time scales for the main forest ecosystems, including evergreen broadleaf forest(EBF), evergreen needleleaf forest(ENF), deciduous broadleaf forest(DBF), and mixed forest(MF) relying on 16 flux towers with a total of 68 site-year datasets. Overall, site-specific evaluation of multi-year mean annual GPP estimates indicates that the current MOD17A2 product works highly effectively for MF and DBF, moderately effectively for ENF, and ineffectively for EBF. Except for tropical forest, MODIS estimates could capture the broad trends of GPP at 8-day time scale for all other sites surveyed. On the annual time scale, the best performance was observed in MF, followed by ENF, DBF, and EBF. Trend analyses also revealed the poor performance of MODIS GPP product in EBF and DBF. Thus, improvements in the sensitivity of MOD17A2 to forest productivity require continued efforts.
出处 《Chinese Geographical Science》 SCIE CSCD 2015年第5期537-548,共12页 中国地理科学(英文版)
基金 Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.41401221,41271500,41201496) Opening Fund of Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Wetland and Watershed Research(Jiangxi Normal University),Ministry of Education,China(No.PK2014002)
关键词 MOD 17A2 FLUXNET community eddy covariance (EC) gross primary productivity (GPP) forest ecosystem evaluation 森林生态系统 总初级生产力 MODIS 测量灵敏度 全球陆地 协方差 涡度 实时
  • 相关文献

参考文献51

  • 1Archibald S A, Kirton A, Van der Merwe Met al., 2009. Drivers of inter-annual variability in net ecosystem exchange in a semi-arid savanna ecosystem, South Africa. Biogeoseiences, 6(2): 251-266. doi: 10.5194/bgd-5-3221-2008.
  • 2Aubinet M, Heinesch B, Longdoz B, 2002. Estimation of the carbon sequestration by a heterogeneous forest: night flux corrections, heterogeneity of the site and inter-annual variabil- ity. Global Change Biology, 8(11): 1053-1071. doi: 10.1046/j. 1365-2486.2002.00529.x.
  • 3Beer C, Reichstein M, Tomelleri E et al., 2010. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate. Science, 329(5993): 834-838. doi: 10.1126/science. 1184984.
  • 4Berbigier P, Bonnefonda J M, Mellmann P, 2001. CO2 and water vapour fluxes for 2 years above Euroflux forest site. Agricul- tural and Forest Meteorology, 108(3): 183-197. doi: 10.1016/ $0168-1923 (01 )00240-4.
  • 5Betts A K, Zhao M, Dirmeyer P Aet al., 2006. Comparison of ERA40 and NCEP/DOE near-surface data sets with other ISLSCP-II data sets. Journal of Geophysical Research: At- mospheres (1984-2012), 111(D22). doi: 10.1029/2006JD0 07174.
  • 6Blonquist J, Montzka S A, Yakir D et al., 2010. The potential of carbonyl sulfide as a tracer for gross primary productivity at flux tower sites. American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, B21G-07. doi: 2010AGUFM.B21G.07B.
  • 7Carvalhais N, Reichstein M, Ciais P et al., 2010. Identification of vegetation and soil carbon pools out of equilibrium in a proc- ess model via eddy covariance and biometric constraints. Global Change Biology, 16(10): 2813-2829. doi: 10.1111/j. 1365-2486.2010.02173.
  • 8Chasmer L, Barr A, Hopkinson C et al., 2009. Scaling and as- sessment of GPP from MODIS using a combination of air- borne lidar and eddy covariance measurements over jack pine forests. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(1): 82-93. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.08.009.
  • 9Cohen W B, Maiersperger T K, Yang Z et al., 2003. Comparisons of land cover and LAI estimates derived from ETM+ and MODIS for four sites in North America: a quality assessment of 2000/2001 provisional MODIS products. Remote Sensing of Environment, 88(3): 233-255. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2003.06.006.
  • 10Coops N C, Black T A, Jassal R P Set al., 2007. Comparison of MODIS, eddy covariance determined and physiologically modelled gross primary production (GPP) in a Douglas-fir for- est stand. Remote Sensing of Environment, 107(3): 385401. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.010.

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部