期刊文献+

动态面孔表情优势效应的心理机制及神经基础 被引量:7

Psychological and Neural Mechanisms for the Superiority Effect of Dynamic Facial Expressions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 动态面孔表情优势效应是指较静态面孔表情而言,个体在识别动态的面孔表情时表现出较好的识别能力。动态面孔表情优势效应的心理机制主要涉及增强的构形加工、补偿角色和面孔模仿能力。此外,该优势效应的神经网络则由核心的神经网络和扩展的神经网络组成,前者主要负责早期的知觉编码和刺激的运动加工,而后者与个体的面孔模仿能力、刺激的动态表征等有关。今后的研究应集中在完善延伸的神经网络、拓展其心理机制;开展动态面孔表情优势效应的发展性研究;考察面孔表情的刚性运动特征;注重在虚拟现实环境下研究动态面孔表情的优势效应。 The superiority effect of dynamic facial expressions is a well established phenomenon in the face processing literature, whereby dynamic facial expressions are better recognized than static facial expressions. The psychological mechanisms underlying this superiority effect include the enhancement of configural processing, the compensatory role, and the ability of facial mimicry. In addition, its neural networks consist of the core and extended system for face processing, the former is mainly responsible for the early perceptual code and motion processing of stimuli, while the latter is associated with the ability of facial mimicry and dynamic representation of stimuli. Future research should enrich the extended neural networks and psychological mechanisms, as well as conduct the developmental research for the superiority effect of dynamic facial expressions. There is also a need to investigate the rigid features of facial motion, and focus on the superiority effect of dynamic facial expressions in virtual reality environments.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第9期1514-1522,共9页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 贵州师范大学研究生创新基金[研创2014(05)] 贵州师范大学博士科研启动费项目[社科博[2013(9)]资助
关键词 动态面孔表情优势效应 心理机制 神经网络 情绪知觉障碍 神经成像技术 the superiority effect of dynamic facial expressions psychological mechanisms neural networks disorder of affective perception neuroimaging technologies
  • 相关文献

参考文献47

  • 1雷旭,刘欢,李红.睡眠的同步EEG-fMRI研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2013,21(3):448-457. 被引量:6
  • 2汪海玲,傅世敏.面孔倒置效应的研究与理论述评[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(11):1588-1594. 被引量:17
  • 3汪亚珉,黄雅梅.面孔识别中的构形加工与特征加工[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(8):1126-1137. 被引量:27
  • 4Alves, N. T. (2013). Recognition of static and dynamic facial expressions: A study review. Estudos de Psicologia, 18, 125-130.
  • 5Ambadar, Z.,Schooler, J. W., & Cohn, J. F. (2005). Deciphering the enigmatic face-the importance of facial dynamics in interpreting subtle facial expressions. Psychological Science, 16’ 403-410.
  • 6Biilthoff, H. H.,Cunningham, D. W.,& Wallraven, C. (2011). Dynamic aspects of face processing in humans. In S. Z. Li &A. K. Jain (Eds.),Handbook of face recognition (pp. 575-596). London, The United Kingdom: Springer-Verlag.
  • 7Cunningham, D. W., & Wallraven, C. (2009). The interaction between motion and form in expression recognition. In B. Bodenheimer & C. O'Sullivan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV2009) (pp. 4144). New York: APGV.
  • 8Decety, J., Skelly, L.,Yoder, K. J., & Kiehl, K. A. (2014). Neural processing of dynamic emotional facial expressions in psychopaths. Social Neuroscience, 9, 36-49.
  • 9Dong, Q.,Zhang, H. C.,& Zhou, X. L. (2005). Mathematical cognition: Brain and cognitive research and its implications for education. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Science Edition), (3),40-46.
  • 10Fiorentini, C.,& Viviani, P. (2011). Is there a dynamic advantage for facial expressions. Journal of Vision, 77, 17.

二级参考文献164

  • 1汪亚珉,傅小兰.面部表情识别与面孔身份识别的独立加工与交互作用机制[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(4):497-516. 被引量:15
  • 2汪亚珉,傅小兰.区分度在面部表情与面孔身份识别交互中的作用[J].心理学报,2007,39(2):191-200. 被引量:13
  • 3Yue, X. M., Cassidy, B. S., Devaney, K. J., Holt, D. J., & Tootell, R. B. H. (2010). Lower-level stimulus featuresstrongly influence responses in the fusiform face area. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 35-47.
  • 4Mondloch, C. J., Le Grand, R., & Maurer, D. (2002). Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing. Perception, 31,553-566.
  • 5Mondloch, C. J., Maurer, D., & Sara, A. (2006). Becoming a face expert. Psychological Science, 17, 930-934.
  • 6Moscovitch, M., & Winocur, G. (1997). What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a personwith visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 555-604.
  • 7Perrett, D. I., & Oram, M. W. (1993). Neurophysiology of shape processing. Image and Vision Computing, 11, 317-333.
  • 8Rivest, L, Moscovitch, M., & Black, S. (2009). A comparative case study of face recognition: The contribution of configural and part-based recognitionsystems, and their interaction. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2798-2811.
  • 9Rossion, B. (2008). Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychologica, 128, 274-289.
  • 10Rossion, B., Dricot, L., Devolder, A., Bodart, J.-M., Cromraelinck, M., de Gelder, B., et al. (2000a). Hemispheric asymmetries for whole-based and part-basedface processing in the human fusiform gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12,793-802.

共引文献40

同被引文献49

引证文献7

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部