摘要
评估是检验科普展览功能与价值实现程度的重要工具。本研究通过梳理、分析中美两国科普展览评估的发展历程与制度要求等现状,对比发现:美国的科普展览评估兴起于20世纪初,经百年发展已形成系统规范、制度化、注重量化的三段式评估体系,对科普展览评估的要求业已制度化;中国到20世纪80年代才开始关注展览评估,二十余年来的观众研究和评估实践较为有限,尚未建立长效的展览评估机制。两国的科普展览评估实践在类型、主体、内容、方法等方面也存在较大差异。
Evaluation plays an important role in measuring science technology exhibitions＇ function and value. Afteranalyzing and comparing the development course and current situation of evaluation of science technology exhibitions bothin America and China,some differences have been found. Firstly,evaluation of science technology exhibitions in Americaemerged in the beginning of the 20 th century,and has formed a quantitative-focused evaluation system including front-end, formative, remedial, and summative evaluation so far. While Chinese researchers had not paid attention to theevaluation of science technology exhibition until the 1980 s,thus carrying out visitor studies and evaluation practices farless than American works. Secondly, there are institutional demands of evaluation for government-funded science technology exhibitions, yet Chinese government has no such requirements. Thirdly, evaluation practices of science technology exhibition in America and China vary in type,evaluator,content and tools.
出处
《科普研究》
北大核心
2015年第4期64-70,83,共8页
Studies on Science Popularization
关键词
科普展览
评估
比较研究
science ＆technology exhibition
evaluation
comparative study
