汉宋之争与《四库全书总目》的修撰

Conflicts between Han Learning and Song Learning and the Compilation of “Overall Indexes of Four Categorical Cannons”

自《四库全书》修成以来,关于《四库》馆内的汉宋之争时有论及,多认为《四库》馆为"汉学之大本营",《四库全书总目》亦为汉学之体现。然若以翁方纲和姚鼐为中心,可以发现,为学偏向义理的学者在《四库》馆内通过"正面对抗"和"迂回坚持"两种途径坚持己见。以纪昀为代表的总纂官并没有对由宋学家撰写的、偏向宋学的提要予以批判,从思想的角度说,并没有予以根本改撰。

Since the compilation of 'Four Categorical Cannons',conflicts between Hanxue and Songxue in Four Categorical Cannons 'Museum have been discussed. Many believe that the Museum is the'Sinology camp',and 'Overall Indexes of Four Categorical Cannons' is the embodiment of Sinology. With Weng Fanggang and Yao Nai as the center,we can find that argumentation-oriented scholars at the Museum held on to their own views by'confrontation'and'roundabout adherence'. Ji Yun,as representative of the general compilation officers,did not criticize synopses written by scholars of Song learning of the Song Dynasty,and from the perspective of thoughts,and did not fundamentally recompile them.