期刊文献+

医患共同决策诊疗模式对精神分裂症患者治疗依从性的影响 被引量:3

Influences of shared decision making on schizophrenic treat-ment compliance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨医患共同决策诊疗模式的实施对精神分裂症患者治疗依从性的影响。方法将46例精神分裂症患者随机分为两组,每组23例,均接受常规抗精神病药物治疗及护理,研究组在治疗全过程中与患者共同决策治疗方案,对照组予以一般健康教育,观察住院全程,出院后随访1 a 。采用简明精神病评定量表、大体功能评定量表评定临床疗效,自拟治疗依从性调查表评定治疗依从性,统计再住院率。结果出院时、随访6个月及随访1 a ,两组简明精神病评定量表评分均显著低于入院时(P <0.05或0.01),大体功能评定量表评分均显著高于入院时(P<0.01),随访6个月及随访1 a 两组比较差异有显著性(P<0.01)。研究组治疗依从性显著优于对照组(P<0.01),再住院率显著低于对照组(P<0.01)。结论医患共同决策模式的实施能提高精神分裂症患者的治疗依从性和临床疗效,改善社会功能,降低复发率。 Objective To explore the effect of shared decision‐making (SDM ) on schizophrenic treatment compliance .Methods Forty‐six schizophrenics were randomly divided into two groups of 23 ones each , both groups received routine antipsychotic treatment and nursing ,research group made treatment protocol‐sa together with patients during treatment whole course ,control group received general health education , hospitalization whole course was observed ,and were followed up for 1 year after discharge .Efficacies were assessed with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Global Assessment Scale (GAS) ,treatment compliances with the self‐made treatment compliance questionnaire , re‐hospitalization rate after relapse during 1 year follow‐up was added up .Results The BPRS scores of both groups on discharge and in the 6th and 12th month follow‐up lowered more significantly (P〈 0 .05 or 0 .01) and the GAS heightened (P〈0 .01) compared with those on admission ,there were significantly difference between two groups in the 6th and 12th month follow‐up (P 〈 0 .01) .Treatment compliance was better ( P 〈 0 .01) and re‐hospitalization rate lower (P 〈 0 .01) in research than in control group .Conclusion Shared decision‐making could effectively boost schizophrenic compliance and efficacy ,improve social functioning ,and reduce relapse rate .
出处 《临床心身疾病杂志》 CAS 2015年第5期116-118,共3页 Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases
关键词 精神分裂症 诊疗 医患共同决策诊疗模式 治疗依从性 简明精神病评定量表 大体功能评定量表 Schizophrenia diagnosis and treatment shared decision-making treatment compliance BPRS GAS
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献26

  • 1陈可吟.住院病人焦虑的护理对策及伦理要求[J].科技风,2010(18). 被引量:1
  • 2赵明杰.一个医学决策的新模式:探索共享决策的限度[J].医学与哲学(B),2006,27(5). 被引量:3
  • 3Towle A, William Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making [J]. BMJ, 1999, 319(7212) :766-771.
  • 4Whelan T, Levine M, Gafni A, et al. Mastectomy or lumpectomy?Helping women make informed choices [J]. J Clin Oncol,1999,17(6): 1727-1735.
  • 5Frosch DL. Kaplan, RM. Shared decision making in clinical medicine: past research and future directions [J]. Am J Prev Med, 1999, 17(4): 285-294.
  • 6Trevena L, Barratt A. Integrated decision making: definitions for a new discipline [J]. Patient Education and Counseling,2003, 50(3) :265-268.
  • 7Coulter A. Patient information and shared decision-making in cancer care [J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2003, 89(suppl 1 ):S15-S16.
  • 8Charles CA, Whelan T, Gafni A, et al. Shared treatment decision making: what dose it mean to physieians?[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2003, 21(5):932-936.
  • 9Kaplan RM. Shared decision making: a new tool for preventive medicine [J]. Am J Prey Med, 2004,26(1): 81-83.
  • 10Arterburn D,Wellrnan R, West brook E, et al. Introducing decision aids at Group Health was linked to sharply lower hip and knee sur- gery rates and costs[J].Health Aff( Millwood), 2012 ( 31 ) : 2094 : 2104.

共引文献132

同被引文献25

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部