期刊文献+

颅颈动脉狭窄的CTA与DSA对照研究 被引量:5

Comparison study between CTA and DSA in cranial-neck artery stenosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨64层颅颈联合CTA诊断颅颈动脉狭窄的临床应用价值。方法 :收集2012年9月到2014年9月在我院治疗的颅颈动脉狭窄患者75例,均行颅颈联合CTA及常规DSA造影。以DSA为金标准,评价颅颈联合CTA诊断颅颈动脉狭窄的敏感度和特异度;同时评价CTA与DSA在动脉狭窄程度评估上的一致性。结果:在动脉狭窄的检出率上CTA与DSA差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),颅颈联合CTA诊断颅颈动脉狭窄的敏感度、特异度分别为88.9%、99.1%;在评价颅颈动脉狭窄程度上,CTA与DSA的一致性较好,K=0.843。结论 :64层颅颈联合CTA是可靠的血管成像方法 ,能较好地发现颅颈动脉狭窄,在评价颅颈动脉狭窄程度上与DSA有较好的一致性。 Objective:To evaluate the application value of 64-slice spiral CT cranial-neck joint CTA in the diagnosis of cra-nial-neck artery stenosis. Methods:75 cases underwent the cranial-neck joint CTA and conventional DSA were collected. DSA image remains the gold standard. The sensitivity and specificity of cranial-neck joint CTA in diagnosis of cranial-neck artery stenosis were evaluated,the correlation of CTA with DSA were aralyzed. Results:In diagnosis of cranial-neck artery stenosis,the diagnosis rate had no difference between CTA and DSA (P〉0.05),and the sensitivity and specificity of CTA were 88.9% and 99.1%,respectively. CTA was significantly correlated with DSA in evaluating the stenosis grade. The Kappa value was 0.843. Conclusions:The cranial-neck joint CTA is a reliable vascular imaging method,and it is significantly correlated with DSA in diagnosing cranial-neck artery stenosis.
出处 《中国中西医结合影像学杂志》 2015年第4期399-402,共4页 Chinese Imaging Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
关键词 颈动脉狭窄 椎底动脉供血不足 血管造影术 数字减影 体层摄影术 X线计算机 Artery stenosis Vertebrobasilar insufficiency Angiography,digital subtraction Tomography,X-raycomputed
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献121

共引文献172

同被引文献31

  • 1高峰,杜彬,秦海强,申丹丹,王桂红.2007年颈动脉支架成形术专家共识[J].中国卒中杂志,2007,2(5):430-454. 被引量:49
  • 2崔青,赵立华,王振海.颈部血管超声与DSA对颈动脉狭窄病变检测的对比分析[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2013,35(7):801-803. 被引量:9
  • 3胡滨,胡兵.评价颅外颈动脉狭窄的影像学比较研究[J].上海医学影像,2006,15(1):27-29. 被引量:8
  • 4杨浩,邹文英,尹家保,等.颈动脉超声和DSA对颅外段颈动脉狭窄诊断的对比研究[J].医学影像学杂志,2010;20(10):1428-30.
  • 5North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotidendarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high grade carotid stenosis[J].N Engl J Med, 1991,325(7):445-453.
  • 6Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Koelling T, et al. Stroke rates and risk factors in patients treated with radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer [ J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24 : 2779-2785.
  • 7Bitzer M, Topka H. Progressive cerebral occlusive disease after radiation therapy [J]. Stroke, 1995, 26: 131-136.
  • 8Leonardo G, Creseenzi B, Cotrufo R, et al. Impovement in ac- curacy of diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis with duplex ultra- sound scanning with combined use of linear array 7.5 MHz and convex array 3.5 MHz prohes: validation versus 489 arteriograph- ic procedures [ J ]. J Vase Surg, 2002, 37 (6) : 1240-1247.
  • 9Nesehis DG, Lexa FJ, Davis JT, et al. Duplex criteria for deter- ruination of 50% or greater carotid stenosis [ J ]. J Ultrasound Med, 2001, 20 ( 3 ) : 207-215.
  • 10初继栋,宋敏.头颈部CTA和颈部血管彩超在脑梗死患者颈动脉狭窄检测中的应用[J].山东医药,2011,51(15):66-67. 被引量:18

引证文献5

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部