期刊文献+

乳腺影像报告和数据系统在有症状乳腺病变诊断中的应用价值 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨乳腺影像报告和数据系统(breast imaging reporting and data system,BI-RADS)在有症状乳腺病变诊断中的应用价值。方法:回顾性分析260例乳腺病变患者的X线片,并进行BI-RADS分类,与病理对照分析。结果:260例乳腺病变中,BI-RADS 0类中乳腺癌阳性率为40%(8/20),1类25%(2/8),2类2.4%(3/125),3类13.3%(4/30),4类68.6%(35/51),5类100%(26/26)。结论 :BI-RADS在有症状乳腺病变的诊断中有重要价值。合理应用0类,结合临床检查可降低漏诊率。
出处 《中国中西医结合影像学杂志》 2015年第4期446-447,共2页 Chinese Imaging Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) [ M ]. 4th edition. Reston : American Coll- ege of Radiology, 2003 : 112-113.
  • 2Folwer EE,Sellers TA,Lu B,et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) brerst composition desriptors:automated measurement development for full field digital mammography[J]. Mad Phys,2013,40:113502.
  • 3Sickles EA.Nonpalpable,circumscribed,noncalcified solid breast masses:likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size and age of patient[J]. Radiology, 1994,192:439-442.
  • 4Raza S,Goldkamp AL,Chikarmane SA,et al. US of breast ma- sses categorized as BI-1LADS 3,4 and 5:pictorial review of fac- tors influencing clinical managementl[J]. Radiographics,2010,30: 1199-1213.
  • 5Moon WK,Lo CM,Chang JM,et al. Quantitative ultrasound ana- lysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses[J]. J Digit Imaging,2013,26:1091-1098.
  • 6Bantu JK,Hanna LG,Acharyya S,et al. Use of BI-RADS 3 pro- bably benign category in the American college of radiology ima- ging network digital mammographic imaging screening trial[J]. Radiology, 2011,260: 61-67.
  • 7孔文韬,张炜炜.乳腺影像报告与数据系统在鉴别诊断乳腺良恶性肿瘤中的应用价值[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2012,20(9):695-699. 被引量:5
  • 8顾雅佳,吴斌,张帅,杨天锡.使用乳腺影像报告和数据系统诊断乳腺疾病的体会[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(9):931-936. 被引量:27
  • 9陈雯,于代友,刘秀梅,刘红娟,吴月清.BI-RADS乳腺肿块描述词汇与阳性预测值的关系分析[J].中国中西医结合影像学杂志,2013,11(5):552-554. 被引量:6

二级参考文献35

  • 1陆忠烈,蒋伟浩,王立章.乳腺癌钼靶X线征象分析(附114例报告)[J].实用放射学杂志,2006,22(6):740-742. 被引量:26
  • 2American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 3th ed. Reston: Am College Radiol, 1998.1-90.
  • 3Taplin SH, Rutter CM, Finder C, et al. Screening mammography: clinical image quality and the risk of interval breast cancer. AJR,2002,178:797-803.
  • 4Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system: inter-and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR, 2000, 174:1769-1777.
  • 5Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Floyd CE Jr. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. AJR, 1996, 166:773-778.
  • 6Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, et al. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR, 1998, 171:35-40.
  • 7DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 1988, 44:837-845.
  • 8Svanholm H, Starklint H, Gundersen HJ, et al. Reproducibility of histomorphologic diagnoses with special reference to the kappa statistic. APMIS, 1989, 97:689-698.
  • 9Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 1977, 33:159-174.
  • 10Orel SG, Kay N, Reynolds C, et al. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radilolgy, 1999, 211:845-850.

共引文献35

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部