期刊文献+

环境伦理学的困境反思与重建 被引量:4

Plight of Environmental Ethics and Its Development Through Reconstruction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 环境伦理学的诞生和发展一直是以论争的方式展开:人类中心论与非人类中心论之争虽然催生出许多新观念和新理论,但都属于外部性探讨,因而使之陷入当前的"高原"困境。这种困境形成的根本原因有二:一是有意或无意割裂、抛弃伦理学传统,使之无本;二是忽视原理的探讨和构建,使之无根。要真突围这一"高原"困境,必须重新定位环境伦理学的自身性质、内涵及其属性,并在此基础上着力解决"环境道德的基础何在"和"环境道德的边界何在"这两个根本问题,重新续接人类已有的伦理传统,构建环境伦理的自然原理和实践规范原则体系。具体来讲,环境伦理学必须突破人类中心论的虚妄认知,重新发现原本就存在的自然原理即宇宙律令、自然法则、生命原理,它为重新释放人类伦理传统的当代光辉奠定了本体性基石,提供了认知和方法动力。人类伦理传统即人性原理,它以生命原理为基础,以宇宙律令为指南,以自然法则为源泉,展开为道德作为或美德追求。从本质上讲,美德是求义的,所以美德追求必须遵守舍利执爱原理,其激励原则是无私奉献和自我牺牲;而道德是求利的,所以道德作为必须遵守权责对等原理,它统摄四条环境伦理法则,即环境与人共生的关联法则、环境与人相向敞开的价值生成法则、人顺性适应环境的生存法则和人向环境取予的平等成本支付法则。以此四条环境伦理法则为规范,人们在走向环境生境重建的进程中,必须做到凡事利己不损它或利己亦利它。 Environmental ethics has emerged and developed with controversy. Although giving rise to many new ideas and theories, the debate between anthropoeentrism and non-anthropoeentrism, the external discussion, has put environmental ethics in the current "plateau" dilemma. This dilemma results from two aspects. First, the tradition of ethics has been intentionally or unintentionally split and abandoned, and so it has lost its basis. Second, the study and construction of principles have been neglected, and so it has been rootless. To break through the "plateau" dilemma, the nature, connotation and properties of the environmental ethics should be redefined. On this basis, two fundamental questions, "where the foundation of environmental ethics is laid" and "where the boundary of environmental ethics lies", should be answered to continue the existed ethics tradition, and construct the natural principle and practical norms of environmental ethics. Specifically, the false cognition of anthropocentrism should be abandoned and some natural principles should be rediscovered, namely the cosmic laws, the natural law, and the principle of life, which lays the ontological foundation for ethical tradition to release the contemporary glory and provides power in cognition and approach. Human ethical tradition refers to the principle of human nature, which takes the principle of life as the basis, the cosmic law as the orientation, and the law of nature as the origin, and presents itself as moral conduct and virtue pursuit. Essentially, virtue is based on justice, and so we must abide by the principle of upholding-love-instead-of-interests while pursuing virtues, with selfless dedication and self sacrifice as the incentive; however, moral is based on interests, and so we must comply with the principle of reciprocity of power and responsibility when implementing moral conducts, which contains four environmental ethics rules,namely, the association rule of symbiosis of environment and human, value generation rule of the mutual opening between environment and human, survival rule of human' s accommodation with environment and the rule of equality between cost and payment in human's exploitation of environment. With the four environmental ethics rules as the norm, people should benefit themselves and others as well; if not, people mustn't harm others when benefiting themselves in the process of reconstructing the environment and the habitat.
作者 唐代兴
出处 《南京林业大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 2015年第2期27-42,共16页 Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"生态文明建设中的气候伦理研究"(14BZX100)
关键词 环境伦理 自然原理 权责对等原理 环境利益最大化再生原则 环境利益平等共享原则 environmental ethics the law of nature the principle of reciprocity of power and responsibility the regeneration principle of maximum environment interests the principle of equally sharing of environment interests
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1L.汉斯,C.苏珊娜,张敦敏.环境伦理学[J].世界哲学,1997(3):69-81. 被引量:5
  • 2Blackstone W, "Ethics and ecolog"////Blackstone W, Philosophy and environmental crisis, Georgia: University of Georgia Press, 1974, p.49.
  • 3Passmore J, Man's responsibility for nature: ecological problem and western tradition, London: Gerald uckworth & Co. Ltd., 1974,p.186.
  • 4Passmore J, Man's responsibility for nature: ecological problem and western tradition, London: Gerald uckworth & Co. Ltd., 1974,p.187.
  • 5Hargrove E, Foundations of environmental ethics, Lodon: Prentice Hall, 1989,pp. 115-134.
  • 6P. Taylor, Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986, p.250.
  • 7岩佐茂.《环境的思想》[M].中央编译出版社,1997年版.第82页.
  • 8纳什.《大自然的权利:环境伦理学史》,杨通进译,青岛出版社1999年版,43,40页.
  • 9E.C.Hargrove, "Weak Anthropocentric Intrinsic Value", The Monist, April, 1992, p.56.
  • 10A.Naess, "A Defence of the Deep Ecology Movement",Environmental Ethics, Fall, 1984,p. 114.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Eugene C. Hargrove. Foundations of Environmental Ethics[M]. Deton, 1996.
  • 2Charles Coulston Gillispie. Genesis and Geology: A Study in the Relations of Scientific Thought, Natural Theology, and Social Opinion in Great Britain,1790-1850 EMT. New York: Harper, 1959.
  • 3Influence of the East on Western Gardens, http://www. gardenvisit.com/got/14/2.htm.
  • 4Chinese Influence on English Gardens, http://www. gardenvisit.com/got/15/landscape-garden.htm.
  • 5Lynn White, Jr. The Historical Roots of OurEcologic Crisis EJ]. Science, 1967, (155).
  • 6John Passmore. Man's Responsibility for Nature:Ecological Problems and Western Traditions[M].New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1974.
  • 7Ramachandra Guha.Radical American Environmentalism and Wilderness Preservation: AThird World Critique[J].Environmental Ethics,i989, (11).
  • 8Jim Cheney. Postmodern Environmental Ethics:Ethics as Bioregional Narrative[J]. Environmental Ethics, 1989, (11).
  • 9David Harmon. Cultural Diversity, Human Subsistence, and the National Park Ideal [J].Environmental Ethics, 1987, (9).
  • 10G.W.Burnet and Kamuyu wa Kang'ethe.Wilderness and the Bantu Mind [J]. Environmental Ethics, 1994, (16).

共引文献254

同被引文献13

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部