期刊文献+

不同时期产程干预对自然临产阴道分娩的临床效果观察 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察不同时间产程干预对自然临产阴道分娩的临床效果。方法2011年9月1日至12月31日行产程干预116例为对照组。2014年981日至12月31日行产程干预150例为观察组。观察不同时期产程干预对自然临产阴道分娩的临床效果差异。结果两组在宫口扩张6cm所需时间、第一产程所需时间均无统计学差异(P〉0.05),观察组第二产程所需时间比对照组短(P〈0.05);两组在分娩后羊水污染、新生儿出生后窒息、产后发热或尿潴留、会阴水肿、阴道裂伤或血肿、宫颈裂伤vY.72.产后出血量等方面均无统计学差异(P〉0.05)。结论正确处理产程,减少宫口扩张6cm前过多的产程干预,增加自然分娩率,降低剖宫产率,保障孕产妇分娩安全。
出处 《浙江临床医学》 2015年第9期1512-1513,共2页 Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Friedman EA. The graphic analysis of labor. AmJ Obstet Gynecol,1954, 68:1568~1575.
  • 2Friedman EA. Primigravid labor:a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol,1955,6: 567~589.
  • 3Zhang J,Landy HJ,Branch DW,et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor',pith normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol,2010, 116: 1281~1287.
  • 4Zhang J,Troendle JF,Yancey MK.Reassessing the labor curve in nuUiparous women.AmJ Obstet Gynecol,2002,187(4):824~828.
  • 5Zhang J,Troendle J,Mikolajczyk R,et al. The natural history of the normal first stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol,2010,115:705~710.
  • 6Friedman EA. Labor clinical evaluation and management.2nd ed. New York:Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1978.
  • 7新产程标准及处理的专家共识(2014)[J].中华妇产科杂志,2014,49(7):486-486. 被引量:390
  • 8漆洪波,杨慧霞,段涛.关注和采纳正常产程和产程异常的新标准[J].中华妇产科杂志,2014,49(7):487-489. 被引量:82
  • 9谢幸,苟文丽,主编.妇产科学.第八版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013,142.
  • 10Spong CY,Berghella V,Wenstrom KD,et al. Preventing the first cesarean delivery:summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal- Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetriciar~s and" Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol,2012,120:118~1193.

二级参考文献20

  • 1Friedman EA.Primigravid labor:a graphicostatistical analysis [J].Obstet Gynecol,1955,6:567-589.
  • 2Zhang J,Landy H J,Branch DW,et al.Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes[J].Obstet Gynecol,2010,116:1281-1287.
  • 3Spong CY,Berghella V,Wenstrom KD,et al.Preventing the first cesarean delivery:summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development,Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine,and American College of Obstetricians andGynecologists Workshop [J].Obstet Gynecol,2012,120:1181-1193.
  • 4Le Ray C,Fraser W,Rozenberg P,et al.Duration of passive and active phases of the second stage of labour and risk of severe postpartum haemorrhage in low-risk nulliparous women[J].Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2011,158:167-172.
  • 5Friedman EA.The graphic analysis of labor[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,1954,68:1568-1575.
  • 6Friedman EA.Primigravid labor:a graphicostatistical analysis [J].Obstet Gynecol,1955,6:567-589.
  • 7Friedman EA.Labor clinical evaluation and management[M].2nd ed.New York:Appleton-Century-Crofts,1978.
  • 8Zhang J,Troendle J,Mikolajczyk R,et al.The natural history of the normal first stage of labor[J].Obstet Gynecol,2010,115:705-710.
  • 9Zhang J,Landy HJ,Branch DW,et al.Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes[J].Obstet Gynecol,2010,116:1281-1287.
  • 10Suzuki R,Horiuchi S,Ohtsu H.Evaluation of the labor curve in nulliparous Japanese women[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2010,203:226.

共引文献426

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部