美国《联邦证据规则》对我国刑事证据法律的借鉴意义探析

The Value of Inspiration of Criminal Evidence Law in China from American “Federal Rules of Evidence”

因刑事诉讼理念差异,美国司法机关在面对价值冲突并进行选择时,优先考虑"程序的正当性"和"无罪推定",如对辛普森案件的处理,严格适用《联邦证据规则》中的关联性证据规则和非法证据排除规则。我国也应当加快刑事证据法律体系建设,尤其应该加快《证据法》的立法进程,在调整诉讼政策和利益时,应以人权保障为核心,努力实现程序正义和公平。

Due to differences in the concept of criminal proceedings, countries value options in the judicial aspects of the formation of a different lawsuit. Common law countries are often faced with the choice of various conflicting values, while the US judiciary in the face value of the conflict provides choices, often giving priority to＂the legitimacy of the program＂and the＂presumption of innocence＂principle, such as handling the Simpson case, the US Court of strict compliance with the＂Federal Rules of Evidence＂in＂association rules of evidence＂and＂exclusionary rule.＂For the value of China＇s criminal law of evidence, our judiciary should also speed up the construction of the legal system of criminal evidence, especially speed up＂the law of evidence,＂the legislative process, when adjusting litigation policies and interests should be at the core of human rights protection, and efforts to achieve justice and procedural fairness.