期刊文献+

财政分权与地方政府规模的空间计量分析 被引量:3

The Spatial Econometrics Study about Fiscal Decentralization and Local Government Size
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从"利维坦"假说出发,对财政分权和地方政府规模之间的内在关系进行分析,选取1997-2012年中国31个省市面板数据进行空间计量检验。结果表明:中国财政分权和地方政府规模均表现出较强的空间集聚效应,并有不断增强的趋势,同质政府财政竞争激励且重点在支出一端;控制空间效应后,财政分权对地方政府总规模具有显著地抑制效应,"利维坦"假说在中国省级层面得到验证,财政自主性拉大了地方政府规模,转移支付的"粘蝇纸效应"、软预算约束问题明显;不同类型地方政府规模对财政分权的反应差异明显,预算内和预算外规模对财政分权和财政自主性的反应完全相反。 Based on the " Leviathan" hypothesis,this paper analyzes the inherent relationship between fiscal decentralization and local government size,and tests it with spatial econometrics methods based on 1997-2012China's 31 provinces panel data.The results show that Chinese fiscal decentralization and local government size show strong and growing spatial clustering effect,and homogeneous governments conduct fierce finances competition and they focuse on expenditure;after controlling the spatial effect,fiscal decentralization has a significant inhibitory effect on local government total size,and " Leviathan" hypothesis has been verified in the Chinese provincial level.The finances autonomy widens local government size,transfer payments' "flypaper effect" and soft budget constraint problem are obvious;different types of local government size react to fiscal decentralization differently,and budgetary and extra-budgetary local government size react to fiscal decentralization and fiscal autonomy conversely.
出处 《现代财经(天津财经大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第7期34-44,共11页 Modern Finance and Economics:Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics
基金 中央高校基本科研重大项目(SWU1309369) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(SWU1209442)
关键词 财政分权 地方政府规模 “利维坦”假说 空间效应 Fiscal Decentralization Local Government Size "Leviathan"hypothesis Spatial Effects
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

二级参考文献629

共引文献12246

同被引文献34

  • 1张晏,龚六堂.分税制改革、财政分权与中国经济增长[J].经济学(季刊),2005,5(1):75-108. 被引量:785
  • 2金煜,陈钊,陆铭.中国的地区工业集聚:经济地理、新经济地理与经济政策[J].经济研究,2006,41(4):79-89. 被引量:654
  • 3Geoffrey Brennan, James M. Buchanan. Toward a tax constitution for leviathan [ J ]. Journal of Public Economics, 1977, (08) :255 - 273.
  • 4Brenna G. , Buchanan J. The power to tax: Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1980.
  • 5John Ashworth, Emma Galli, Fabio Padovano. Decen- tralization as a constraint to leviathan: A panel co - integration analysis[ J]. Public Choice,2013, (156) :491 -516.
  • 6Matthias Wrede. Vertical and horizontal tax competi- tion:Will uncoordinated leviathans end up the wrong side of the Laffer Curve [ J]. Finanzarchiv, 1996,53 (03) :461 - 479.
  • 7Michael Keen, Christos Kotsogiannis. Leviathan and capital tax competition in federations [ J ]. Journal of Public Eco- nomic Theory,2003,5 (02) : 177 - 199.
  • 8Thomas A. Garrett. The leviathan lottery testing the rev- enue maximization objective of state lotteries as evidence for levi- athan [J]. Public Choice,2001, ( 109 ) : 101 - 117.
  • 9Clotfelter C. , Cook P. Selling hope: State lotteries in America [M]. Cambridge : Harvard University Press, 1989.
  • 10杨灿明,孙群力.外部风险对中国地方政府规模的影响[J].经济研究,2008,43(9):115-121. 被引量:80

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部