摘要
贝克、吉登斯和拉什从政治、传统和美学角度,构建自反性现代化的理论。作为风险社会、风险文化理论的代表人物,三位学者都把自反性现代化作为理论基础,从自反性现代化的内涵、分析视角、自反性现代化的后果等方面进行了激烈的对话,阐释了自反性现代化和风险社会的本质,他们的观点有着共性又存在着本质的区别。以自反性现代化和风险社会理论分析我国社会现阶段面临的实际问题,以期更好地认识风险与规避风险,从而有效地进行风险的治理。
In the book of Reflexive Modernization, Baker, Giddens and Lash from the perspective of politics,tradition and aesthetics, haveconstructed the theory of reflexive modernization. As the representatives of risk society theory and risk cultural theory, three 'of them regard the reflexive modernization as their theoretical basis. They have the same attitudes with essential differences remained. Baker, Giddens and Lashhave dialoguesabout the reflexivity modernization connotation, analysis perspective, consequencesand so on, through which we can clearly know and understand the essences of their arguments. Using this theory to study the reality of China, we hope to better understand the risks, avoid the risks and effectivelymanage them.
出处
《广东开放大学学报》
2015年第4期52-57,共6页
JOURNAL OF GUANGDONG OPEN UNIVERSITY
关键词
自反性现代化
风险社会
风险治理
风险文化
reflexive modernization
risk society
riskmanagement
risk culture