期刊文献+

肝创面对拢缝合与创面敞开短期临床结局的对比研究 被引量:2

Comparative study of short-term clinical outcome of hepatic cutting surface by suture and open management
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对比肝断面对拢缝合与创面敞开的短期临床结局,以更好地进行肝创面的临床处理。方法回顾性分析本院2013年1月至2014年1月66例肝切除术患者的临床资料,其中44例行对拢缝合(对拢缝合组),22例行创面敞开(创面敞开组)。比较两组患者的短期临床结局。结果对拢缝合组手术时间明显短于创面敞开组[(128.43±25.78)min vs(155.16±10.21)min,t=4.379,P=0.04]。对拢缝合组术后第1、2天的腹腔引流量均少于创面敞开组(P=0.01、0.03)。对拢缝合组术后第1、3天谷丙氨酶(ALT)、血清总胆红素(TBIL)水平均高于创面敞开组(ALT:P=0.02、0.04;TBIL:P=0.04、0.03),对拢缝合组术后第1、3天白蛋白(Alb)明显低于创面敞开组(P=0.04、0.04),术后第5天ALT、TBIL、Alb情况两组比较差异无统计学意义。两组术中出血量(P=0.17)、肝门阻断时间(P=0.25)差异无统计学意义。结论针对肝创面的处理,因为创面敞开对组织损伤是最小的,所以创面敞开应该被临床推荐。 Objective To compare the short-term clinical outcome of hepatic cutting surface by suture and open management. Methods The clinical data of sixty-six patients underwent hepatectomy from January 2013 to January 2014 in our hospital were analyzed, with 44 by suture and 22 open management, re-spectively. Results Operation time of the suture group was shorter than the open group[(128.43 ±25.78) min vs(155.16 ±10.21) min, t =4.379, P =0.04); postoperative day 1 and day 2 abdominal drainage of the suture group was less than the other group(P=0.01, 0.03). ALT and TBIL of the suture group 1- and 3-day after operation was higher than open group(ALT: P=0.02, 0.04; TBIL: P=0.04, 0.03). The level of Alb of the suture group after operation was lower than the open group(P=0.04, 0.04). There were no significant differences of the amount of bleeding(P=0.17) and the time of hepatic portal blocking(P=0.25) during operation between the two groups. Conclusion The open management of hepatic cutting surface can be clinically proposed due to less tissue trauma.
机构地区 解放军第
出处 《中华普通外科学文献(电子版)》 2015年第4期37-40,共4页 Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 肝切除 肝断面创面处理 短期结局 Hepatectomy Management of hepatic cutting surface Short-term outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献44

  • 1赵建勇,董家鸿,李家辉,杨占宇.不同疾病肝切除术的并发症分析[J].第三军医大学学报,2006,28(14):1541-1542. 被引量:7
  • 2樊嘉,王晓颖.肝切除术后胆漏的处理[J].肝胆外科杂志,2006,14(4):243-244. 被引量:17
  • 3Lo CM, Fan ST, Liu CL, et al. Biliary complications after he- patic resection. Arch Surg, 1998,133: 156-161.
  • 4Ziaoddin A. Use of microporous particles in prolonged vascular acess bleeding after hemodialyses. Presented at 35 th annual meeting of American society of nephrology. Philadelphia: Penn- sylvania, 2002. 12-18.
  • 5Ereth MH, Sibonga J, Henderson JL, et al. Impact of comm. on hemostatic agents on bone healing. Anesthesiaology, 2003, 99 : 730.
  • 6Tan ST, Tope WD. Effectiveness of microporous polysaccharide hemospheres for achieving hemostatsis in mobs mierogramphie surgery. Dermatol Surg, 2004, 30:908-914.
  • 7Sabol F, Vasilenko T, Novotny M, et al. Intradermal running suture versus 3M^TM Vetbond^TM Tissue adhesive for wound closure in rodents, a biomechanical and histologicar study [J], EurSurg Res, 2010,45(3-4):321 -326.
  • 8Bege T, Emungania O, Vitton V, et al. An endoscopic strategy for management of anastomotic complications from bariatric surgery: a prospective study[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2011 , 73(2) : 238 -244.
  • 9Gonzalez HD, Figueras Flip J. Topical hemostatic devices in surgew- between science and Marketing [ J ]. Cir Esp, 2009, 85(7): 23 -28.
  • 10Di Carlo I, Toro A. Sealing all of the resection liver surface to maximize the adhesive strength of the carrier -bound fibrin sealant[J]. Arch Surg, 2011, 146(2): 239.

共引文献34

同被引文献23

引证文献2

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部