摘要
庭审是一种高度程序化、机构化的活动,庭审的各个参与主体都有明确的角色定位与权力认知,其间又存在复杂的目的关系。尽管庭审中充斥着各种各样的不遵守合作原则的情况,表现出明显的不合作现象,但是,掌控话语权的法官、公诉人和律师等会利用自己的权力,使用各种策略和手段来迫使当事人合作,使庭审重新回到正常轨道,从而在宏观层面实现庭审的合作。
Trial is a highly routinized and institutional activity,in which all the participants have the clear knowledge about their role and power,and there are also complicated goal relationship among the participants. Although there are various non- compliances of the Cooperative Principle and obvious noncooperations in trials,judges,prosecutors,and lawyers who have the speech power will force the litigant to cooperate,making the trids go back to normal,and thus achieve the cooperation at the macro level.
出处
《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》
2015年第3期60-64,共5页
Journal of Hunan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金
甘肃省社科规划项目"语用学视角的法律话语分析研究"(13YD095)
关键词
庭审
合作原则
合作
不合作
trials
cooperative principle
cooperation
non-cooperation