绩效考核政治性研究述评被引量：14

A Literature Review of Performance Appraisal Politics

导出

摘要绩效考核政治性是指考核者在绩效考核过程中考虑一些非相关因素导致的故意歪曲员工绩效考核结果的非伦理行为。相关研究对绩效考核政治性的发生、影响和作用机制进行了探索,而国内学界对该领域关注甚少。本文从绩效考核政治性的概念、内涵、结构与测量、前因及结果等方面对该领域的相关文献进行了系统的梳理,并讨论了现有研究的不足与未来可能的研究方向,以期为相关研究及实践工作提供有价值的参考。 Performance appraisal politics refers to unethical behavior of the raters who consider some unrelated factors and distort employees＇ performance appraisal results deliber- ately in the process of performance appraisal. Relevant researches have explored its occur- rence, influences, and function mechanisms. However, researchers in China pay little atten- tion to this field. In order to provide a valuable reference for related research and practice, this paper systematically reviews the concept, connotation, structure and measurement, ante- cedents and consequences of performance appraisal politics, and discusses the limitations of previous research and possible directions in future research.

作者汪洪艳陈志霞

机构地区华中科技大学公共管理学院湖北理工学院

出处《外国经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第9期57-67,共11页 Foreign Economics & Management

基金国家社会科学基金重大项目(11&ZD033) 中央财经专项课题(HUST2013WT007)

关键词组织政治绩效考核绩效考核政治性 organizational politics performance appraisal performance appraisal politics

分类号 C939 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献50

1Ahmed I, Mohammad S K and Islam T. The relationship between perceived fairness in performance appraisal and organi- zational citizenship behavior in the banking sector of Pakistan:The mediating role of organizational commitment[J]. In- ternational Journal of Management and Innovation, 2013,5 (2) : 75 -- 88.
2Antonioni D and Park H. The relationship between rater affect and three sources of 360-degree feedback ratings[J]. Jour- nal of Management, 2001,279 (4) : 479--495.
3Arshad M A , Masood M T and Amin G. Effects of performance appraisal politics on job satisfaction, turnover intention and loyalty to supervisor study with reference to the telecom organizations of Pakistan[J]. International Review of Ma- nagement and Business Research, 2013,2 (3) : 653-- 673.
4Aryee S, Chen Z X and Budhwar P S.Exchange fairness and employee performance: An examination of the relationship be- tween organizational politics and procedural justice[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2004,94 (1):1--14.
5Beemon D R and Sharkey T W. The use and abuse of corporate politics[J]. Business Horizons, 1987,30(2):26--30.
6Bernardin H J and Beatty R W. Performance appraisal:Assessing human behavior at work[M]. Boston:Kent, 1984.
7Bernardin H J and Viltanova P. Performance appraisal[A], in Locke E A(Ed.). Generalizing form laboratory to field set- ting[C]. Lexington MA: D.C. Health, 1986 : 43-- 62.
8Bernardin H J, Cooke D K and Villanova P. Conscientiousness and agreeableness as predictors of rating lenieney[J]. Jour- nal of Applied Psychology,2000,85(2) :232--236.
9Bol J (2. The determinants and performance effects of supervisor bias[EB/OL], http://ssrn, com/abstract= 1089077, 2010-9-1.
10Brown M, Hyatt D and Benson J. Consequences of performance appraisal experience[J]. Personnel Review, 2010,39 (3) :375--396.