期刊文献+

分离式承台摇摆抗震及其有限元模拟 被引量:2

Finite element modeling methods of aseismic rocking separated pile-cap foundation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了提供一种桥梁抗震的可选方案,根据摇摆抗震的基本思想,阐述了自复位分离式承台的构想,将传统桥梁桩基础的承台一分为二,使承台上部能够在地震作用下摇摆,从而在基础部位隔断地震传播途径,达到减隔震的目的。分析了该抗震方法的抗震原理,阐释了该抗震方法可能采用的各种构造工艺与施工方式。传统的摇摆抗震数值模拟技术将摇摆接触面区域视为刚体,不考虑接触面的弹性变形,与实际情况不符,故采用了将摇摆区域(文中为承台)采用三维实体有限元模拟的精细化建模方法,并与传统的建模方法进行对比。分析表明:在现有的桥梁抗震设计技术与施工技术支持下,分离式承台具有工程应用的可能性,在有限元模拟中,将摇摆区域视为刚体的做法会放大结构的位移响应,是一种偏保守的做法。 To propose an alternative seismic strategy,a self-centering separated pile-cap that could rock under seismic load in order to cut off the path at the bottom of the foundation of common bridges that energy would transfer was introduced. The principle of this aseismic system is analyzed and multiple tectonic possibilities with feasible construction methods are illustrated. The traditional simulation method for rocking structure treated the rocking contact surface,i.e.,the rocking foundation as rigid body,ignoring the elastic deformation,which was not quite the case. To optimize this issue,an elaborate finite element model with the rocking area( which is the cap in this paper) simulated by 3-dimensional solid elements is proposed and then compared with traditional modeling method.The analysis in this paper shows that under current bridge seismic design technique and construction technology,aseismic rocking separated pile-cap foundation has its possibility in engineering application. Therefore,seeing the rocking area as rigid in FEM methods would conservatively amplify the displacement response of the structure.
出处 《哈尔滨工程大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期759-764,共6页 Journal of Harbin Engineering University
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51478339 51278376) 土木工程防灾国家重点实验室基金资助项目(SLDRCE14-B-14)
关键词 分离式承台 摇摆抗震 自复位 抗震设计 桥梁 separated pile-cap rocking isolation self-centering seismic design bridge
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献48

  • 1FEMA 273 NEHRP guidelines and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings [ S ]. Washington DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1997.
  • 2FEMA 356 Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings[ S]. Washington DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.
  • 3FEMA 445 Next-generation performance-based seismic design guidelines: program plan for new and existing buildings [ S]. Washington DC, USA : Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2007.
  • 4Report of the seventh joint planning meeting of NEES/ E-defense collaborative research on earthquake engineering[ R]. PEER 2010/109. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, 2010.
  • 5Roh H. Seismic behavior of structures using rocking columns and viscous dampers [ D ]. Buffalo : University at Buffalo, The State University of New York. Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, 2007.
  • 6Housner G W. The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes [ J ]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1963, 53 (2) : 403- 417.
  • 7Hukelbridge A A, Clough R W. Preliminary experimental study of seismic uplift of a steel frame [ R ]. Report No. UCB/EERC-77/22. Berkely: University of California, Berkely, 1977.
  • 8Hukelbridge A A. Earthquake simulation tests of a nine story steel frame with columns allowed to uplift [ R ]. Report No. UCB/EERC-77/23. Berkely: University of California, Berkely, 1977.
  • 9Priestley M J N, Evison R J, Carr A J. Seismic response of structures free to rock on their foundations [ J ]. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 1978, 11 (3) : 141-150.
  • 10Makris N, Konstantinidis D. The rocking spectrum and the shortcomings of design guidelines [ R ]. Report No. PEER-01/07. Bekeley : University of California, Berkeley. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 2001.

共引文献226

同被引文献22

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部