不同介入方法治疗急性脑梗死的临床效果观察

Clinical Effect of Different Interventional Methods in the Treatment of Acute cerebral Infarction

目的：探讨不同介入方法治疗急性脑梗死的临床研究。方法纳入研究对象为2013年-2015年在本院就诊的急性脑梗死80例患者，随机分为支架取栓组40例和静脉溶栓组40例。两组均给予常规治疗，与此同时，静脉溶栓组给予静脉溶栓治疗，支架取栓组给予支架取栓治疗，比较两组疗效的差异。结果支架取栓组治疗后疗效优于静脉溶栓组，差异具有统计学意义（P 〈0.05）。结论在急性脑梗死患者给予支架取栓治疗，跟静脉溶栓治疗对比，能够显著改善患者神经功能和预后，因此，可将支架取栓治疗作为急性脑梗死患者首选疗法。

Objective To explore the clinical research of different intervention methods in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction.Methods The study subjects were 80 patients with acute cerebral infarction in our hospital from 2013 to 2015 , and were randomly divided into 40 cases with stent thrombosis and 40 cases with venous thrombolysis group. The two groups were given conventional treatment, at the same time, intravenous thrombolysis group was given intravenously, and the stent was treated by the stent, and the difference between the two groups was compared.ResultsAfter treatment, the efficacy of the stent group was significantly better than that of intravenous thrombolysis group （P〈 0.05）.Conclusion In patients with acute cerebral infarction, the patients with stent thrombosis, compared with intravenous thrombolytic therapy, can significantly improve the neurological function and prognosis, therefore, can be treated as the first choice for acute cerebral infarction patients.