期刊文献+

HPV18E6蛋白与蛋白激酶R对核因子NF—κBp65表达及磷酸化调控作用比较 被引量:2

Comparing the regulation effects on expression and phosphorylation of nuclear factor NF-κB p65 by HPV18E6 protein and protein kinase R
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较人乳头状瘤病毒(humanpapillomavirus,HPV)18型E6蛋白与蛋白激酶R(PKR)对核因子NF-κBp65表达及磷酸化的调控作用。方法分别构建靶向HPV18E6及PKR基因的短发夹结构RNA干扰序列的重组质粒载体,转染HeLa细胞,以实时荧光定量PCR法检测各组细胞HPV18E6、PKR及NF-κBp65mRNA的表达,以WesternBlot法检测各组细胞HPV18E6、PKR、NF—κBp65蛋白及后两者磷酸化型蛋白的表达,采用SPSS15.0软件包单因素方差分析及Newman-Keuls-q检验比较上述指标在各组间的表达差异。结果在沉默HPV18E6基因表达的基础上,pSilencer—RNAi-E6转染组PKRmRNA、蛋白及磷酸化型蛋白的相对表达量均高于pSilencer—NC转染组及空白对照组(P〈0.05),而NF-κBp65mRNA、蛋白及磷酸化型蛋白的相对表达量均低于pSileneer—NC转染组及空白对照组(P〈0.05);在沉默PKR基因表达的基础上,pSileneer—RNAi-PKR转染组NF-κBp65mRNA、蛋白及磷酸化型蛋白的相对表达量与pSileneer-NC转染组及空白对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论HPV18E6蛋白是HeLa细胞核因子NF—κBp65表达及磷酸化的主要调控者;PKR的表达及磷酸化均受到抑制,对NF—κBp65的调控作用弱。 Objective To Compare the regulation effects on expression and phosphorylation of nuclear factor NF-κB p65 by human papilloma virus 18 subtype E6 (HPV18E6) protein and protein kinase R (PKR). Methods Constructed two recombinant plasmid vectors which contained shRNA interfering sequence aiming at the targets of HPV18E6 oneogene and PKR gene, and transfected them respectively into HeLa cell,the expression of mRNA of HPV18E6,PKR and NF-κB p65 were determined with real-time quantitative PCR, the expression of protein HPV18E6, PKR, NF-κB p65 and phosphating PKR (P-PKR), phosphating NF-κB p65 (P-NF-κB p65 )were determined with Western Blot. The expression differences of these indicators among every group were compared with one-factor analysis of variance and Newman-keuls-q test of statistical software of SPSS15.0 edition. Results Based on interfering the expression of HPV18E6 oncogene, the expression of PKR mRNA and protein and phosphating protein in pSilencer-RNAi-E6 transfection group were higher than those in pSilencer-NC transfeetion group and blank control group( P 〈 0. 05 ) , but the expression of NF-κB p65 mRNA and protein and phosphating protein in pSilencer-RNAi-E6 transfeetion group were lower than those in pSilencer-NC transfection group and blank control group( P 〈 0. 05 ). Based on interfering the expression of PKR gene, the expression of NF-κB p65 mRNA and protein and phosphating protein in pSilencer-RNAi-PKR transfection group, pSilencer-NC transfection group and blank control group had no significant difference( P 〉0. 05). Conclusions HPV18E6 protein was the main regulator of expression and phosphorylation of nuclear factor NF-κB p65 in HeLa cell. The expression and phosphorylation of PKR were both suppressed,so PKR regulated NF-κB p65 weakly in HeLa cell.
出处 《中华实验和临床病毒学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2015年第4期292-295,共4页 Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Virology
基金 天津市卫生局科技基金重点项目(2012KR05)
关键词 核因子 乳头状瘤病毒 蛋白激酶类 HELA细胞 Nuclear factor Papilloma virus, human Protein kinases HeLa cells
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1罗远材,瞿全新,糜若然,郭路,张灏.人乳头状瘤病毒18型E6蛋白的信号转导初探[J].中华微生物学和免疫学杂志,2011,31(7):597-602. 被引量:5
  • 2罗远材,郭路.宫颈病变组织中PKR与NF-κBp65的表达与磷酸化观察[J].天津医药,2013,41(11):1055-1058. 被引量:3
  • 3Delgado Andr N, De Lucca FL. Knockdown of PKR expression by RNAi reduces pulmonary metastatic potential of B16-FIO melanoma cells in mice: possible role of NF-kappaB. Cancer Lett, 2007,258 : 118-125.
  • 4Garcia MA, Gil J,Ventoso I, et ah Impact of Protein Kinase PKR in Cell Biology: from Antiviral to Antiproliferative Action. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 2006, 70 : 1032-1060.
  • 5Adhikary A,Mohanty S,Lahiry L,et ah Theaflavins retard human breast cancer cell migration by inhibiting NF-kappaB via p53- ROS cross-talk. FEBS Lett. 2010,584:7-14.

二级参考文献21

  • 1赵彤,朱梅刚,黄宗义,张亚历,张素娟,李梅芳.肺癌癌基因蛋白产物同步检测的对比分析[J].癌症,1995,14(1):13-15. 被引量:54
  • 2Pindel A, Sadler A. The role of protein kinase R in the interferonresponse. J Interferon Cytokine Res, 2011,31 (1) : 59-70.
  • 3Nallagatla SR, Toroney R, Bevilacqua PC. Regulation of innate immunity through RNA structure and the protein kinase PKR. CurtOpin Struct Biol, 2011, 21(1) : 119-127.
  • 4Su Q, Wang S, Baltzis D, et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation acts as a molecular switch to full-scale activation of the elF2alpha RNA- dependent protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006, 103(1) : 63-68.
  • 5Kazemi S, Papadopoulou S, Li S, et al. Control of alpha subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2 alpha) phospho- rylation by the human papillomavirus type 18 E6 oncoprotein: im- plications for eIF2 alpha-dependent gene expression and cell death. Mol Cell Biol, 2004, 24(8) : 3415-3429.
  • 6Dutta J, Fan Y, Gupta N, et al. Current insights into the regula- tion of programmed cell death by NF-kappaB. Oncogene, 2006, 25 ( 51 ) : 68006-6816.
  • 7Maru Y. Encounter of cancer cells with bone. Cancer and inflam- mation-input and output of NF-KB. Clin Calcium, 2011, 21 (3) : 364 -371.
  • 8Guerra S, Lopez-Femandez LA, Garcia MA, et al. Human gene profiling in response to the active protein kinase, interferon-in- duced serine/threotine protein kinase (PKR) , in infected cells. Involvement of the transcription factor ATF-3 in PKR-induced ap- optosis. J Biol Chem, 2006, 281(27) : 18734-18745.
  • 9Chaturvedi MM, Sung B, Yadav VR, et al.NF - KB addiction and its role in cancer: one size does not fit all[J).Oncogene, 20ll,30(14): 1615-1630.
  • 10Wang S,Liu Z,Wang L,et aJ.NF-kappaB signaling pathway, inflam?mation and colorectal cancer[J).Celi Mol Immunol, 2009,6(5):327- 334.

共引文献5

同被引文献8

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部