欧洲一体化中的差异性：以申根区临时恢复内部边境管制为例被引量：4

Differentiation in the European Integration:the Temporary Reintroduction of Internal Border Control in the Schengen Area

下载PDF

导出

摘要申根合作是欧洲一体化建设的重要成果,也是差异性发展最为显著的领域。本文以申根法则的豁免条款——临时恢复内部边境管制条款为例,分析了该差异性条款的内容和实施情况,探讨了欧盟修订相关条款的动因、过程和结果,并指出欧盟机构与成员国围绕修订条款产生的分歧实质上是超国家主义和政府间主义之争。修订后的条款存在的问题和成员国差异性的利益诉求仍将导致该特殊例外的滥用难以避免,将可能强化申根合作的差异性发展趋势。 This paper focuses on the derogation of the Schengen rules,namely the temporary reintroduction of internal border control.The paper first introduces its content and implementation,and then discusses the revision of this derogation.It is argued that the disputes over the Schengen governance package reflect the divergences between supranationalism and intergovernmentalism.The unsolved problems with the clause and the divergent interests of the member states will make the abuse of the derogation unavoidable in the future and may strengthen the trends of differentiation in Schengen cooperation.

作者陈洁

机构地区南京大学国际关系研究院南京航空航天大学外国语学院、国际战略与安全研究中心

出处《国际论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期7-12,79,共6页 International Forum

基金国家社科基金青年项目“欧盟差异性一体化及其对我国推动命运共同体建设的启示研究”(编号14CGJ004)的阶段性成果中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(编号NJ20150039) 江苏省教育厅社科基金项目(编号2013SJD810006)的资助

关键词欧盟差异性申根临时恢复内部边境管制

分类号 D51 [政治法律—国际政治]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献28

1Frank Schimmelfennig and Thomas Winzen, "Instrumental and Constitutional Differentiation in the EU', Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol.52, No.2, 2014,p.354.
2Committee on Constitutional Affairs, "On Constitutional Problems of A Multi-tier Governance in the European Union", 2012/2078 (INI), 15 November 2013.
3Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders (Schengen Implementation Agreement), 19 June, 1990. Internal Borders of Europe? Examining the Schengen Governance Package", Utrecht Law Review, Volume.
4Decision of the Executive Committee on the procedure for ap- plying Article 2 (2) of the convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, 20 December, 1995.
5Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movemem of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code), Brussels, 15 March,2006.
6European Commission, "Report on the application of Title III (Internal Borders) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 es- tablishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code)", COM (2010) 554, Brussels, 13 October,2010.
7Maartje A.H. van der Woude and Patrick van Berlo, "Crim- migration at the 11, Issue 1, January 2015, pp.73-74.
8Kees Groenendijk, "Reinstatement of Controls at the Internal Borders of Europe.- Why and Against Whom?", European Law Journal, Vol. 10, No. 2, March 2004, pp. 162-163.
9Bruno Waterfield, "Germany threatens to reintroduce border checks in row over Tunisian refugees", The Telegraph, 11 A- pril, 2011. http.-//www, telegraph, co. uk/news/worldnews/ europe/germany/8443632/Germany-threatens-to- reintroduce-border-checks-in-row-over-Tunisian-re fugees. html, 访问日期:2012年5月8日.
10Andrew Willis, "Barroso moots return of internal EU bor- ders", Euobserver, Brussels, 2 May 2011, https:// euobserver.com/news/32247, 访问日期:2015年6月2日.