期刊文献+

作为内在属性的倾向性及其反事实条件句表达

Dispositionality as Intrinsic Properties and Their Counterfactual Expressions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 倾向性问题是当代分析哲学的核心问题。诉诸虚拟条件句是理解倾向性的基本出发点,但必须对条件句的语义学解释作出恰当限制。当代哲学关于属性的一般形而上学研究蕴含倾向属性是内在属性,这一点深入揭示了倾向属性相对于自然定律的索引性特征。此特征引导我们走向一种标准的反事实条件句语义学,它所提供的语义学限制将为简单条件句分析提供恰当辩护。 The problem of dispositionality is at the center of contemporary analytic philosophy. Appealing to subjunctive conditionals is the point of departure in understanding dispositionality. But the semantic interpretation of the conditionals calls for qualification. The general metaphysics of properties imply that dispositional properties are intrinsic,and that reveals the indexicality of dispositional properties relative to laws of nature. This semantic qualification points to the way of justifying the simple conditional analysis,by embracing the standard counterfactual semantics.
作者 何朝安
出处 《南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期1-6,共6页 Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"倾向性属性的反事实条件句表达研究"(13YJC720014) 东华大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目"科学定律的反事实条件句表达"(13D111017)
关键词 倾向属性 内在属性 反事实条件句 dispositional properties intrinsic properties counterfactuals
分类号 O89 [理学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Choi,S.Dispositions[EB/OL].http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dispositions/.
  • 2沈旭明.自然种类本质的倾向性解读[J].自然辩证法研究,2012,28(2):6-11. 被引量:6
  • 3张建琴.当代科学哲学本体论中的自然律[J].自然辩证法研究,2014,30(12):3-9. 被引量:2
  • 4Choi,S.The Simple vs.Reformed Conditional Analysis of Dispositions[J].Synthese,2006,148:369-379.
  • 5Marshall,D.Intrinsic vs.Extrinsic Properties[EB/OL].http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/intrinsic-extrinsic/.
  • 6Jaegwon,K.Psychophysical Supervenience[J].Philosophical Studies,1982,41:51-70.
  • 7Vallentyne,P.Intrinsic Properties Defined[J].Philosophical Studies,1997,88:209-19.
  • 8Lewis,D.Extrinsic Properties[J].Philosophical Studies,1983,44:197-200.
  • 9Lewis,D.Counterfactuals and Comparative Possibility[J].Journal of Philosophical Logic,1973,2:418-446.
  • 10Bird,A.Dispositions and Antidotes[J].The Philosophical Quarterly,1998,48:227-234.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Hall, A. D.. The Scientific Revolution 1500- 1800[ M]. Lon-don, New York and Toronto: Longmans Green, 1954.
  • 2Armstrong, D.M.. What is a Law? [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
  • 3Hume D.. An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding[M]. Ox- ford : Oxford University Press, 1999.
  • 4Lewis, D.. Causation [ J ]. Journal of Philosophy. Seventieth Annu- al Meeting of the American Philosophical Association Eastern Divi- sion, 1973,70(17) :556 -567.
  • 5Fraassen, B. Van. Pr6cis of Laws and Symmetry [J]. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1993,53 ( 2 ) : 411 - 412.
  • 6Michel, G.. Laws of Nature: Do We Need a Metaphysical? [ J ]. Principia ,2007,11 (2) : 127 -149.
  • 7Bird A.. Nature' s Metaphysics : Laws and Properties [ M ]. Ox- ford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
  • 8Dretske, F.I.. Laws of Nature [ J]. Philosophy of Science, 1977, 44 (2) :248 -268.
  • 9Laudan, L.. A Confutation of Convergent Realism [ C]//Philoso- phy of Science, 1981 reprinted in Papineau, D (ed), The Philos- ophy of Science. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1996 : 107 - 138.
  • 10Armstrong, D.M.. What is aLaw? [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部