销售假药罪违法性判断研究——基于陆勇代购印度抗癌药一案

A Research on the Illegality of Purchasing Counterfeit Drugs——Based on the Case of LU Yong Purchasing Counterfeit Drugs

饱受关注的陆勇代购"假药"一案最终以检察机关的撤诉落下帷幕。从这起案件的始末中,体现出诸多行政法与刑法在违法性判断中存在的冲突,重申了对刑事法律进行实质解释的价值,揭示了我国刑事司法理念正向尊重和保障人权出发的重大转变。国外及国际组织关于假药的界定往往采取实质解释,在行刑交叉案件中,要坚持刑法构成要件要素认定的独立性,并通过实质性解释判断药品真假,并进而判断陆勇一案的出罪事由。

Highly focused, the case of LU Yong purchasing counterfeit drugs ended with a dismissal. From the whole case narrative, we can find conflicts between administrative law and criminal law, telling the basis of unlawfulness criteria. The value of material interpretation of criminal lawhas been reaffirmed. What＇s more, the dramatic turnaround has been revealed with our criminal judicial idea towards respecting and safeguarding human rights.Foreign countries and international organizations always defined counterfeit drugs by the way of material interpretation. When the both of administrative law and criminal law have jurisdiction over a case, the tatbestand of criminal law should maintain their independence, and to determine the identification of some medicines substantially, analyzing the reason why LU Yong is not guilty.