期刊文献+

沟床草被对干热河谷冲沟产沙特性影响的野外模拟试验 被引量:13

Field experiment on impacts of grass belt length on characteristics of sediment yields and transport rates for gullies in Jinsha dry-hot valley region
下载PDF
导出
摘要 金沙江干热河谷冲沟极为发育,水土流失强烈,严重威胁着该区的生态安全和社会经济发展。为探明植被影响径流过程、促进沟床稳定的机理,该研究采用野外放水冲刷试验,研究分析了沟床草被带长度对径流产输沙过程和特征的影响,旨在探明沟床草被影响下径流含沙量和输沙率时空变化规律。结果表明:1)增大草被带长度可有效降低冲沟径流泥沙含量,改变径流泥沙含量的时空分布特征。泥沙含量在时间上呈指数递减趋势,在冲沟径流运动方向上呈增大趋势。沟床草被带越长,泥沙含量在时间上波动性越弱,递减趋势越明显;随沟床草被带长度的增大,径流泥沙含量在沟床径流运动方向上的增大趋势有减缓现象;此外,当草被带长度增加到8 m以后,进一步增加草被带长度对减小径流泥沙含量效果不显著,而对照小区和4 m草被带小区泥沙含量均显著高于草被带长度≥8 m的小区,说明8 m草被带是降低径流泥沙含量的较好配置长度;2)沟床草被带对径流输沙率有减小作用。当草被带长度<8 m时,径流输沙率高于草被带>8 m的小区,且在时间上呈先增大后急剧减小而后趋于稳定的变化趋势。当草被带长度≥8 m时,径流输沙率在时间上表现出微弱的降低趋势。试验冲沟径流输沙率均值在空间上沿径流运动方向自冲沟上游至其下游表现出增大趋势,但草被带长度对输沙率在冲沟径流运动方向上的增大过程有较大影响。该研究为植被措施控制冲沟侵蚀提供理论依据。 Permanent gully is well developed in Jinsha Dry-hot valley region in China. The ravine density of this region can be up to 7.4 km/km2 with the maximum soil erosion modulus 1.64×104 t/(km2·a). Gully erosion seriously threatens the ecological security and social-economic development of the region. Vegetation is one of effective measures to cut down soil erosion. In order to explore the mechanism that vegetation affects overflow movement and promotes gradual stability of active permanent gullies, and find out efficient approaches and methodologies to control the development of permanent gullies in this area, a field scouring experiment was carried out between March and April 2013. The study aimed to investigate the impact of grass belt length on runoff sediment yields and transportation process as well as the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of sediment content and sediment transport rate. Five experimental plots with grass belt length of 0, 4, 8, 12 and 16 m were constructed on an in-situ gully head in the Gully Erosion and Collapse Experimental Station, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences the Ministry of Water Resources, Chengdu. Observing cross-sections were set in the gully bed every 4 m as well as an observing cross-section in the drainage area in every plot, and the distance between the gully headwall and the observing cross-section in the drainage area was 1 m. In addition, the width of flow section was measured by steel tap, the depth of runoff was measured by straightedge, and the velocity of overland flow was detected by staining method. Furthermore, sediment samples were collected by particular plastic bottles in every observing cross-section, and oven drying method was utilized to determine the sediment content, and sediment transport rate was calculated by sediment content and flow rate of flow cross-section. The results showed that: 1) Increasing grass belt length could not only effectively reduce the sediment content, but also change the spatio-temporal distribution of sediment content; Runoff sediment content decreased in an exponential function with the flushing time and exhibited an increasing trend along with the experimental plots from the upstream drainage area to downstream gully bed; The fluctuation degree of sediment content over the experimental time went through a decrease process with the increase of grass belt length; As the increase of grass belt length, the fitness of sediment content with experimental time became better, that is to say, the downward trend of sediment content became more and more obvious; On the other hand, although the sediment content underwent an increase process, the increasing trend of sediment content became weaker and weaker along with the experimental plots from the upstream drainage area to downstream gully bed; 2) the grass belt could reduce the sediment transport rate; The sediment transport rate in the experimental plots where the grass belt length was less than 8 m were higher than those in plots where the grass belt length was greater than 8 m; Moreover, when the grass belt length was less than 8 m, sediment transport rate exhibited to increase firstly and then change to sharply decrease and then tended to stable over the whole experimental time; However, runoff sediment transport rate had a weakly decreasing trend over the experimental time when the grass belt length was or greater than 8 m; Furthermore, with the increase of grass belt length, runoff transport rate of the same position observing cross-section in every experimental plots tended to decrease; The mean of runoff sediment transport rate of every observing cross-section showed an increasing trend along with the experimental plots from the upstream drainage area to downstream gully bed, while the specific increasing way of sediment transport rate was influenced by the grass belt length. Comparably, 8 m grass belt may be the optimal length for reducing runoff sediment content.
出处 《农业工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第15期124-132,共9页 Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划资助项目课题(2015CB452704) 中国科学院"西部之光"重点项目(Y4R2060060) 四川省应用基础研究计划项目(2014JY0067) 国家人力资源与社会保障部留学人员科技活动择优资助项目(2013年度)
关键词 输沙 径流 土壤 冲沟侵蚀 草被带长度 产沙量 sediment transport runoff soils gully erosion grass belt length sediment yield
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1王小丹,钟祥浩,范建容,李辉霞.金沙江干热河谷元谋盆地冲沟沟头形态学特征研究[J].地理科学,2005,25(1):63-67. 被引量:29
  • 2高维森,沙毓沧,张映翠,秦向阳.有偿投入开发治理小流域效益及可行性[J].水土保持通报,1997,17(3):21-26. 被引量:3
  • 3柴宗新,范建容,刘淑珍.金沙江下游元谋盆地冲沟发育特征和过程分析[J].地理科学,2001,21(4):339-343. 被引量:33
  • 4Gabris G, Kertesz A, Solyom P, et al. Ravine and gully erosion in the hilly headwater areas of Hungary[M]// Haigh M, Krecek J. Environmental Reconstruction in Headwater Area. Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers,2000: 137-145.
  • 5Poesen J V K, Van Wesemael B. Contribution of gully erosion to sediment production in cultivated lands and rangelands[M]// Walling D E, Webb B W. Erosion and Sediment Yield: Global and Regional Erspectives. Exeter, England: IAHS Publications, 1996: 251-266.
  • 6Kertész á, Gergely J. Gully erosion in Hungary, review and case study[J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011, 19: 693-701.
  • 7Ben-Hur M, Fernandez C, Sarkkola S, et al. Overland Flow, soil erosion and stream water quality in forest under different perturbations and climate conditions[M]// Bredemeier M, Cohen S, Godbold DL, et al. Forest Management and the Water Cycle: An Ecosystem-Based Approach. Netherlands: Springer, 2011: 263-289.
  • 8Bettiga L J, Smith R, Cahn M. Evaluation of the impacts of in-row vineyard floor management practices on soil and water erosion, vine growth, and productivity of grapevines[J]. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2012, 63(3): 441A-441A.
  • 9Butt M J, Waqas A, Mahmood R, et al. The combined effect of vegetation and soil erosion in the water resource management[J]. Water Resources Management, 2010, 24(13): 3701-3714.
  • 10Tefera B, Sterk G. Land management, erosion problems and soil and water conservation in Fincha\'a watershed, western Ethiopia[J]. Land Use Policy, 2010, 27(4): 1027-1037.

二级参考文献71

共引文献135

同被引文献221

引证文献13

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部