期刊文献+

替莫唑胺联合全脑放疗治疗非小细胞肺癌脑转移瘤的近期临床疗效观察 被引量:7

Temozolomide combined with whole-brain radiotherapy in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer complicated with metastatic brain tumor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 观察替莫唑胺联合全脑放疗治疗非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者的临床疗效及安全性.方法 回顾分析了确诊非小细胞肺癌脑转移的患者32例,予以常规分割性全脑放疗,剂量DT 40 Gy (2Gy,1次/d,每周5d),放疗期间每日口服替莫唑胺75 mg,/(m2·d),放疗结束后每4周予以替莫唑胺200 mg/ (m2·d)口服5d方案化疗,共6周期.生存率使用Kaplan-Meier方法计算.结果 32例患者均可评价疗效,其中完全缓解5例(15.6%),部分缓解19例(59.3%),稳定4例(12.5%),进展4例(12.5%),近期治疗有效率74.9%,临床获益率87.4%,中位生存期7.6个月.治疗的不良反应主要表现为胃肠道症状、骨髓抑制,患者均可耐受.结论 替莫唑胺联合全脑放疗方案治疗非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者有较好的近期疗效及安全性,值得在临床进一步使用. Objective To observe the therapeutic effect and toxicity of temozolomide combined with whole-brain radiotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer complicated with metastatic brain tumor.Methods 32 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who were diagnosed with brain metastases orally took temozolomide (75mg/m2·d) and received 40 Gy fractionated conventional external-beam radiotherapy (2 Gy per day,5 days per week) for 4 weeks.After radiotherapy,patients took temozolomide (200mg/m2·d) for 5 days every 4 weeks for 6 cycles.Progression-free survival curves and overall were estimated by Kaplan-Meier technique.Results All the 32 patients were evaluable for response with 5 cases of CR,19 PR,4 SD,and 4 PD.The overall response rate was 74.9% and the clinical benefit rate was 87.4%.The median progression-free survival time was 7.6 months.The main side effects were gastrointestinal reaction and myelosuppression,which were alleviated by symptomatic treatment.Conclusions Temozolomide combined with whole-brain radiotherapy is effective with mild toxicity for patients with non-small cell lung cancer who were diagnosed with brain metastases.
出处 《国际医药卫生导报》 2015年第17期2588-2589,2591,共3页 International Medicine and Health Guidance News
关键词 替莫唑胺 全脑放疗 非小细胞肺癌 脑转移瘤 Temozolomide Whole-brain radiotherapy Non-small cell lung cancer Brain metastases
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1Blom JW,Doggen CJM,Osanto S,Rosendaal FR.Malignancies,prothrombotic mutations,and the risk of venous thrombosis[J].JA MA,2005,293 (6):715-722.
  • 2Decousus H,Moulin N,Quenet S,et al.Thrombophilia and risk of venous thrombosis in patients with cancer[J].Thromb Res,2007,120 (Suppl 2):51-61.
  • 3Ay C,Vormittag R,Dunkler D.D-dimer and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 predict venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer:results from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study[J].J Clin Oncol,2009,27 (25):4124-4129.
  • 4Beer JH,Haeberli A,Vogt A,et al.Coagulation markers predict survival in cancer patients[J].Thromb Haemost,2002,88:745-749.
  • 5Blackwell K,Hurwitz H,Lieberman G,et al.Circulating D-dimer levels are better predictors of overall survival and disease progression than carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma[J].Cancer,2004,101 (1):77-82.
  • 6Agterof MJ,van Bladel ER,Schutgens RE,et al.Risk stratification of patients with pulmonary embolism based on pulse rate and D-dimer concentration[J].Thromb Haemost.,2009,102 (4):683-687.
  • 7Streiff MB.Diagnosis and initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer[J].J Clin Oncol.,2009,27 (29):4889-4894.
  • 8Unsul E,Atalav F,Atikcan S,Yilmaz A.Prognostic significance of hemostatic parameters in patients with lung cancer[J].Respir Med,2004,98:93-98.
  • 9Kilic M,Yoldas O,Keskek M,et al.Prognostic value of plasma D-dimer levels in patients with colorectal cancer[J].Colorectal Dis,2008,10 (3):238-241.
  • 10Buccheri G,Torchio P,Ferrigno P.Plasma levels of D-dimer in lung carcinoma-clinical and prognostic significance[J].Cancer,2002,97:3044-3052.

共引文献228

同被引文献41

引证文献7

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部