期刊文献+

鼠李糖乳杆菌抑制阪崎克罗诺杆菌致脑膜炎的体内外实验

Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG inhibits Cronobacter-induced meningitis in neonatal rats
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的考察鼠李糖乳杆菌(LGG)对阪崎克罗诺杆菌致脑膜炎的抑制作用。方法以Caco-2细胞为体外模型,采用黏附侵袭实验研究阪崎克罗诺杆菌对Caco-2细胞的黏附侵袭作用及最佳感染时间,并用不同浓度的LGG与Caco-2细胞作用,确定其抑制阪崎克罗诺杆菌的最佳浓度。进一步通过竞争、排斥和置换实验检测LGG对阪崎克罗诺杆菌黏附侵袭的抑制作用。通过体内实验,研究LGG对乳鼠脑膜炎的作用效果。结果阪崎克罗诺杆菌对Caco-2细胞具有黏附侵袭性,最佳感染时间为3 h。随着加入LGG浓度的增加,阪崎克罗诺杆菌对Caco-2细胞的黏附和侵袭作用被显著抑制。LGG能通过竞争、排斥作用抑制阪崎克罗诺杆菌对Caco-2细胞的黏附。LGG对阪崎克罗诺杆菌引起的脑膜炎具有预防和治疗作用,且预防效果更显著。结论通过体内外实验,LGG可以抑制阪崎克罗诺杆菌进入肠屏障,从而减少其穿越血脑屏障的量,最终达到预防和治疗脑膜炎的效果。 Objective To investigate the inhibitory effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) against Cronobacter-induced meningitis in neonatal rats. Methods The cell adhesion and invasion capacities of Cronobacter were assayed in Caco-2 cells, and the optimal time length and concentration of the bacterium for infection were determined. The suppressive effects of LGG on the adhesion and invasion of Cronobacter in caco-2 ceils were tested by competitive and exclusion experiments, and its inhibitory effect against Cronobacter-induced meningitis was evaluated in neonatal rats. Results Cronobacter showed aggressive adhesion to caco-2 cells with an optimal infection time of 3 h. LGG produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of Cronobacter adhesion and invasion by competing with and excluding the latter for cell adhesion. In neonatal rats, LGG showed an obvious preventive effect and also a moderate therapeutic effect against Cronobacter-induced meningitis. Conclusion LGG can inhibit Cronobacter entry across the intestinal barrier to achieve preventive and therapeutic effects against Cronobacter-induced meningitis.
出处 《南方医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第8期1079-1083,共5页 Journal of Southern Medical University
基金 国家自然科学基金(31300762) 广东省科技计划项目(2012B031800132 2013B021500012) 广州市科技计划项目(2014J4100146)~~
关键词 细菌性脑膜炎 阪崎克罗诺杆菌 鼠李糖乳杆菌 黏附 侵袭 bacterial meningitis Cronobacter Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG adhesion invasion
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Huang SH,Jang AY.Cellular mechanisms of microbial proteins contributing to invasion of the blood-brain barrier [J].Cell Microbiol,2001,3(5):277-87.
  • 2Brouwer MC,Tunkel AR,Van de Beek D.Epidemiology,diagnosis,and antimicrobial treatment of acute bacterial meningitis [J].Clin Microbial Rev,2010,23(3):467-92.
  • 3Schrag SJ,Hadler JL,Arnold KE,et al.Risk factors for invasive,early-onset Escherichia coli infections in the era of widespread intrapartum antibiotic use[J].Pediatrics,2006,118(2):570-6.
  • 4Van Baarlen P,Wells JM,Kleerebezem M.Regulation of intestinal homeostasis and immunity with probiotic lactobacilli [J].Trends Immunol,2013,34(5):208-15.
  • 5Yan QQ,Condell O,Power K,et al.Cronobacter species(formerly known as Enterobacter sakazakii)in powdered infant formula:a review of our current understanding of the biology of this bacterium [J].J Appl Microbiol,2012,113(1);1-15.
  • 6Hunter CJ,Bean JF.Cronobacter:an emerging opportunistic pathogen associated with neonatal meningitis,sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis[J].J Perinatol,2013,33(8):581-5.
  • 7Giri CP,Shima K,Tall BD,et al.Cronobacter spp.(previously Enterobacter sakazakii)invade and translocate across both cultured human intestinal epithelial cells and human brain microvascular endothelial cells[J].Microb Pathog,2012,52(2):140-7.
  • 8Holy O,Forsythe S.Cronobacter spp.as emerging causes of healthcare-associated infection [J].J Hosp Infect,2014,86(3):169-77.
  • 9Vlasova AN,Chattha KS,Kandasamy SA,et al.Lactobacilli and bifidobacteria promote immune homeostasis by modulating innate immune responses to human rotavirus in neonatal gnotobiotic pigs [J].PLoS One,2013,8(10):e76962.
  • 10DaiCl,Zheng CQ,Jiang M,et al.Probiotics and irritable bowel syndrome[J].World J Gastroenterol,2013,19(36):5973-80.

二级参考文献14

  • 1Granato D, Bergonzelli GE, Pridmere RD, et al. Cell surface-associated elongation factor Tu mediates the attachment of Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC533 (Lal) to human intestinal cells and mucins. Infect Immun, 2004, 72(4): 2160-2169.
  • 2Hooper IV, Gordon JI. Commensal host-bacterial relationships in the gut. Science, 2001, 292( 5519 ): 1115-1118.
  • 3Holt J G, et al. Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology. 8th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1984. 797 - 820.
  • 4Tuomola EM, Salminen SJ. Adhesion of some probiotic and dairy Lactobacillus strains to Caco-2 cell cultures. Int J Food Microbiol, 1998, 41( 1 ): 45-51.
  • 5Alander M, Satokari R, Korpela R, et al. Persistence of colonization of human colonic mucosa by a probiotic strain, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, after oral consumption. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1999, 65( 1 ): 351-354.
  • 6Mishra V, Prasad DN. Application of in vitro methods for selection of Lactobacillus casei strains as potential probiotics. Int J Food Microbiol, 2005, 103( 1 ): 109-115.
  • 7Huang Y, Adams MC. In vitro assessment of the upper gastrointestinal tolerance of potential probiotic dairy propionibacteria. Int J Food Microbiol, 2004, 91 ( 3 ): 253-260.
  • 8Vries MC, Vaughan EE, Kieerebezem M, et al. Lactobacillus plantorum-survival, functional and potential probiotic properties in the human intestinal tract. Int Dair J, 2006, 16(9): 1018-1028.
  • 9Tuomola E, Crittenden R, Playne M, et al. Quality assurance criteria for probiotic bacteria, Am. J Clin Nutr, 2001, 73(suppl 2): S393-S398.
  • 10Vesterlund S, Paltta J, Karp M, et al. Measurement of bacterial adhesion-in vitro evaluation of different methods. J Microbiol Meth, 2005, 60(2): 225-233.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部