摘要
管仲作为春秋时期最为伟大的政治家,向来是毁誉参半。苏洵曾在《管仲论》中全面否定管子,批判管子不知本,不能为国家举荐人才。他认为仲之书诞谩不足信,还得出了齐之治在于鲍叔而齐之乱在于管仲的论断。其实细读《管仲论》不难发现,苏洵对管子的评价过于偏激,有失公允。因为管仲向来注重举荐人才,临终时亦能举隰朋以自代,其不可谓不知本。管仲之书是后人根据管仲思想所作,亦是真实可靠的。而齐国祸乱的根源,当是齐桓公任用奸邪所致。
Cuan Zhong,as the Spring and Autumn Period most great statesman,has always been mixed.Su Xun in "Guan theory " negate pipes,tubes do not know this criticism can not recommend talent for the country.He believes that the book of Guan Zhong is lack of faith,it also obtained the rule of Qi is in Baoshu and the chaos of Qi in G uan Zhong.In fact,peruse "Guan theory" is not difficult to find,Su Xun evaluation of the pipe is too extreme,unfair.Because Guan Zhong always pay attention to recommend talent,can also give Xi Peng dying to self-generation,it can not say I do not know this.The book of Guan Zhong was later made according to Guan Zhong' s ideology is also authentic.The roots of Qi bring disaster,when the appointment is treacherous due to Qi Huangong.
出处
《济宁学院学报》
2015年第4期88-92,87,共6页
Journal of Jining University
关键词
《管仲论》
管仲
齐桓公
祸乱
根源
"Guan theory"
Guan Zhong
Qi Huangong
trouble
source