单位犯罪新立法解释与相关司法解释的关系及适用

The Relationship between the Latest Legislative Interpretation and the Related Judicial Interpretation of Corporate Crime and Their Respected Judicial Application

单位为了本单位利益实施犯罪主体仅限于自然人的犯罪行为,司法解释将其认定为自然人犯罪有违罪刑法定的基本原则,立法解释亦将其认定为自然人犯罪属于拟制了一条有法可依的处理路径,由此司法解释与立法解释的处理路径相同但合法性存异。根据法条竞合理论,相关《会议纪要》将其有条件地转化认定为单位犯罪属于提示了一条契合刑法基本理论的已有处理路径,因而《会议纪要》与立法解释虽然处理路径不同但合法性一致。《会议纪要》与立法解释在内容上并不矛盾,立法解释仍可优先于《会议纪要》适用,如此既符合罪责自负的基本原则,也符合罪刑相当的基本原则。

For the corporate crimes whic interpretati way set by and the legislative interpretatio e judicial interpretation violates h only subject to natural persons, both the judicial n consider them as personal crimes. However, the the principle of legality. In addition, according to the theory of the lapping of legal provisions, the meeting summary explains an existing processing path dealing with the corporate crimes, and this path fits with the principle of legality. The content of the legislative interpretation and the meeting summary are not contradictory with each other. With the existence of legislative interpretation, the court should still apply the provisions of meeting summary to the trials, which fits with the principle of bearing responsibility solely for one＇ s own crime and the principle of suiting punishment to crime.