期刊文献+

玻璃钢夹砂管管土摩擦系数室内模型试验研究 被引量:5

Research on Pipe-soil Friction Coefficient of FRPM Pipe by Laboratory Model Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过顶管法室内模型试验,研究了玻璃钢夹砂管与回填中砂之间的摩擦系数。分析了埋深、管径和压实度对管土摩擦系数的影响。试验结果表明:(1)松砂条件下,管身摩阻力随顶进位移的增大呈线性增长,当顶进位移增大到2~3时,管身摩阻力达到峰值,最后趋于稳定;随着埋深的增大,摩擦系数逐渐增大,但增量逐渐变小,其值在0.26~0.28之间。(2)管径的变化基本上不会对玻璃钢管道与砂土之间的摩擦系数产生影响。在管径不变的情况下,随着埋深的增加,管身摩阻力也随之增加。(3)随着压实度的增大,摩擦系数也随之增大,压实度从75%增至95%时,摩擦系数从0.26增至0.32,说明压实度的变化对玻璃钢管道与砂土之间的摩擦系数的影响很大。 Through laboratory model tests of the pipe jacking method,the friction coefficient between FRPM pipe and backfilled sand is studied. Effects of burying depth,pipe diameter and compaction degree on pipe-soil friction coefficient are analyzed. Results from model tests show that:( 1) Pipe friction force increases linearly with the increasing of jacking displacement in the condition of loose sand. It will reach to the maximum value and then tend to be stable under test conditions when jacking displacements reach about 2 ~ 3 mm; Friction coefficient increases gradually with the increasing of burying depth,but its increment which is 0. 26 ~ 0. 28 reduces gradually.( 2) The friction coefficient of FRPM pipe and sandy soil will not be influence by pipe diameter on the whole. Pipe friction force increases with the increasing of burying depth in the condition of constant pipe diameter.( 3) Increment of compaction degree will lead to the increment of friction coefficient. When compaction degree increases from 75% to 95%,friction coefficient increases from 0. 26 to 0. 32. It shows that compaction degree influences the friction coefficient of FRPM pipe and sandy soil greatly.
出处 《石家庄铁道大学学报(自然科学版)》 2015年第3期30-34,39,共6页 Journal of Shijiazhuang Tiedao University(Natural Science Edition)
关键词 管土摩擦 摩擦系数 模型试验 pipe-soil friction friction coefficient model test
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献16

  • 1姚大钧,吳志宏,張郁慧.軟弱粘土中管幕工法之設計與分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(z2):4999-5005. 被引量:37
  • 2张敏江,郭尧,张丽萍,邱欣.直剪试验中对土抗剪强度的一种修正方法[J].沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版),2005,21(2):96-98. 被引量:33
  • 3张家治,杨军.触变泥浆减阻等技术在顶管中的应用[J].天津市政工程,1996,8(3):37-42. 被引量:2
  • 4牛小化.大管径热水供热管道直埋设计的探讨[J].煤气与热力,2007,27(7):76-81. 被引量:9
  • 5江孝提,修长征,李建勋.城镇燃气与热能供应[M].北京:中国石化出版社,2006:295-296.
  • 6Maher M M,Akl A Y,Metwally K G.Advanced analysis of concrete pipe-soil interaction[J].Journal of Engineering and Applied Science,2005,52(3):437-456.
  • 7Desai Chandra S,El-Hoseiny Khaled E.Prediction of field behavior of reinforced soil wall using advanced constitutive model[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2005,131(6):729-739.
  • 8Ling H I,Cardany C P,Sun L X,et al.Finite element study of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining wall with concrete-block facing[J].Geosynthetics International,2000,7(3):163-188.
  • 9Hu Liming,Pu Jialiu.Testing and modeling of soil-structure interface[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2004,130(8):851-860.
  • 10Hu Liming,Pu Jialiu.Application of damage model for soil-structure interface[J].Computers and Geotechnics,2003,30(1):165-183.

共引文献66

同被引文献72

引证文献5

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部