期刊文献+

不同铂类药物联合长春瑞滨治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌临床效果及安全性分析 被引量:10

Effect and safety of different platinum drugs combined with vinorelbine in treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨顺铂、卡铂及奈达铂分别联合长春瑞滨治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的近期疗效和不良反应.方法 纳入92例晚期NSCLC患者,采用简单随机化方法将患者分为顺铂组(34例)、卡铂组(31例)和奈达铂组(27例),3组分别于第1~3天给予顺铂40 mg/m2、卡铂100 mg/m2和奈达铂40 mg/h2,均于第1、8天给予长春瑞滨30 mg/m2.用药4个周期后评价患者近期疗效和不良反应.结果 完成4个周期化疗患者87例,包括顺铂组32例、卡铂组29例、奈达铂组26例.顺铂组完全缓解2例、部分缓解12例、稳定10例、进展8例,有效率43.8% (14/32);卡铂组完全缓解1例、部分缓解12例、稳定10例、进展6例,有效率44.8% (13/29);奈达铂组完全缓解2例、部分缓解10例、稳定9例、进展5例,有效率46.2% (12/26);3组近期疗效比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).恶心、呕吐顺铂组最重,卡铂组次之,奈达铂组最轻,3组恶心、呕吐发生率分别为93.8%(30/32)、69.0%(20/29)和38.5% (10/26),两两比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).3组白细胞减少发生率分别为35.7%(12/32)、51.7% (15/29)和30.8% (8/26),血小板减少发生率分别为18.8% (6/32)、27.6%(8/29)和34.6%(9/26),脱发发生率分别为81.3% (26/32)、79.3% (23/29)和80.8%(21/26),差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).结论 顺铂、卡铂及奈达铂分别联合长春瑞滨治疗晚期NSCLC近期疗效差异无统计学意义,奈达铂出现恶心、呕吐反应最轻. Objective To explore the effect and safety of different platinum drugs combined with vinorelbine in treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods Totally 92 patients of NSCLC were randomly divided into cisplatin group (34 cases) administrated with cisplatin 40 mg/m2 on the 1st-3rd day,carboplatin group (31 cases) administrated with carboplatin 100 mg/m2 on the 1st-3rd day,and nedaplatin group (27 cases) administrated with nedaplatin 40 mg/m2 on the 1st-3rd day; all the three groups were treated with vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 on the 1 st day and 8th day.The short-term efficacy and adverse reactions were evaluated after 4 cycles of chemotherapy.Results There were 87 cases who completed 4 cycles of chemotherapy,including 32 cases in cisplatin group,29 cases in carboplatin group and 26 cases in nedaplatin group.In cisplatin group,there were 2 of complete response,12 of partial response,10 of stability and 8 of progression,showing an efficacy of 43.8% (14/32) ; in carboplatin group,there were 1 of complete response,12 of partial response,10 of stability and 6 of progression,showing an efficacy of 44.8% (13/29) ; in nedaplatin group there were 2 of complete response,10 of partial response,9 of stability and 5 of progression,showing an efficacy of 46.2% (12/26).No statistical differences regarding short-term efficacy of chemotherapy were found among the three groups (P 〉 0.05).The incidence of nausea/vomiting in cisplatin group,carboplatin group and nedaplatin group was 93.8% (30/32),69.0% (20/29) and 38.5% (10/26),respectively,showing statistical differences (P 〈 0.05).In cisplatin group,carboplatin group and nedaplatin group,the incidence of neutropenia was 35.7% (12/32),51.7% (15/29) and 30.8% (8/26) ; the incidence of thrombocytopenia was 18.8% (6/32),27.6% (8/29) and 34.6% (9/26); the incidence of alopecia was 81.3% (26/32),79.3% (23/29),and 80.8% (21/26),showing no statistically differences among the three groups (all P 〉 0.05).Conclusions The therapeutic effects of cisplatin,carboplatin and nedaplatin combined with vinorelbine are not statistically different in patients with advanced NSCLC,and the gastrointestinal reactions of nedaplatin,such as nausea and vomiting,are the most slight.
出处 《中国医药》 2015年第9期1289-1292,共4页 China Medicine
关键词 非小细胞肺 顺铂 卡铂 奈达铂 长春瑞滨 Cancer,non-small cell lung Cisplatin Carboplatin Nedaplatin Vinorelbine
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献107

共引文献153

同被引文献93

  • 1宋琪,程玮.吉西他滨联合顺铂3w方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者近期疗效观察[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(30):36-36. 被引量:2
  • 2李树婷,马飞,孙燕.抗肿瘤代谢新药——培美曲塞[J].癌症进展,2005,3(5):471-476. 被引量:73
  • 3朱方,徐瀚峰,郑勤,张全安.培美曲塞联合奈达铂治疗晚期非鳞状NSCLC的疗效分析[J].实用癌症杂志,2014,29(3):333-335. 被引量:9
  • 4杨学宁,吴一龙.实体瘤治疗疗效评价标准——RECIST[J].循证医学,2004,4(2):85-90. 被引量:1518
  • 5袁方,张勇,蒋永新.不同剂量的胸腺肽α1 联合化疗后对肺癌患者细胞免疫功能的临床观察[J] 昆明医学院院报,2010,3:28-31.
  • 6ETTINGER DS,AKERLEV W,BEPLER G,et al.Non-small cell lung cancer[J].J Natl Compr Canc Netw,2010,8(7):740-801.
  • 7KELLY RJ,GULLEY JL,GIACCONE G.Targeting the immune system in nonsmall-cell lung cancer:bridging the gap between promising concept and therapeutic reality[J].Clin Lung Cancer,2010,11(5):228-237.DOI:10.3816/CLC.2010.n.029.
  • 8THERASSE P,ARBUCK SG,EISENHAUER EA,et al.New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors[J].JNCI,2000,92(3):205-216.DOI:10.1093/jnci/92.3.205.
  • 9ROSELL R,CARCERENY E,GERVA1S R,et al.Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGER mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer(EURTAC):a multicentre,open-label,randomized phase 3 trial[J].Lancet Oncol,2012,13(3):239-246.DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70393-X.
  • 10CHANG A.Chemotherapy,chemoresistance and the changing treatment landscape for NSCLC[J].Lung Cancer,2011,71(1):3-10.DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.08.022.

引证文献10

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部