期刊文献+

疏血通注射液联合美法仑与泼尼松治疗多发性骨髓瘤的效果分析 被引量:8

Effect of Shuxuetong injection combined with chemotherapy regimen of melphalan and prednisolone on patients with multiple myeloma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨疏血通注射液与美法仑联合泼尼松(MP)方案联合治疗多发性骨髓瘤患者的效果.方法 选取2010年2月至2013年10月重庆三峡中心医院血液科收治的72例初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者为研究对象,将患者完全随机分为MP组和疏血通联合MP组,各36例.MP组使用MP方案进行化疗;疏血通联合MP组在MP组基础上,将6ml疏血通注射液加入250 ml 5%葡萄糖溶液中静脉滴注,1次/d.2组均7d为1个疗程,间隔28 d开始下一个疗程,共治疗6个疗程.比较2组患者治疗前及治疗3、6个疗程后血黏度、肾功能、骨髓形态、血钙和β2微球蛋白等水平.结果 治疗6个疗程后,疏血通联合MP组全血高切黏度、全血低切黏度、血浆黏度、血细胞比容、红细胞集聚指数、红细胞刚性指数、β2微球蛋白、骨髓瘤细胞百分比、乳酸脱氢酶、尿素氮与肌酐均低于MP组,红细胞变形指数、血红蛋白高于MP组[(5.1 ±0.5)mPa/s比(6.8±0.6) mPa/s、(10.6±1.6) mPa/s比(13.6±1.3) mPa/s、(1.63±0.16) mPa/s比(2.16±0.21) mPa/s、(0.38±0.04)%比(0.48±0.05)%、(6.6±0.6)比(8.5±0.8)、(5.8±0.6)比(6.5±0.6)、(1 689±172) μg/L比(3 875±395) μg/L、(1.21±0.14)%比(12.47±1.48)%、(130±14) U/L比(215±20) U/L、(5.1±0.5)mmol/L比(6.8±0.6)mmol/L、(10.6±1.6) mmol/L比(13.6±1.3) mmol/L、(2.85±0.28)比(2.18±0.11)、(119±11)g/L比(90±9)g/L],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).结论 疏血通注射液与MP方案联合应用可降低多发性骨髓瘤患者血黏度,改善肾功能. Objective To observe the therapeutic effect of Shuxuetong injection combined with chemotherapy regimen of melphalan and prednisolone (MP) in treating multiple myeloma (MM).Methods Totally 72 patients with MM from Feburary 2010 to October 2013 were enrolled and randomly divided into MP group (36 cases) receiving MP chemotherapy regimen and Shuxuetong ± MP group (36 cases) receiving Shuxuetong (6 ml added to 250 ml 5% glucose solution,1 time/d) on the basis of MP regimen.Each course of treatment consisted of 7 days with an interval of 28 days between two courses,and the treatment last for 6 courses.Before treatment and after 3-6 courses,the blood viscosity,renal function,marrow cell morphology,serum calcium and β2 microglobulin were measured and compared between the two groups.Results After 6 courses,the Shuxuetong ± MP group had lower blood high shear viscosity,blood low shear viscosity,plasma viscosity,hematocrits,erythrocyte aggregation index,red cell rigidity index,β2 microglobulin,myeloma cell percentage,actate dehydrogenase,urea nitrogen and serum creatinine,higher erythrocyte deformation index and higher hemoglobin compared with those in control group [(5.1 ±0.5) mPa/s vs (6.8 ±0.6) mPa/s,(10.6 ± 1.6) mPa/s vs (13.6 ± 1.3) mPa/s,(1.63 ±0.16) mPa/s vs (2.16 ±0.21) mPa/s,(0.38 ±0.04)% vs (0.48 ±0.05)%,(6.6 ± 0.6) vs (8.5±0.8),(5.8±0.6)vs (6.5±0.6),(1 689 ±172)μg/L vs (3 875±395) μg/L,(1.21 ± 0.14)% vs (12.47 ±1.48)%,(130 ±14) U/L vs (215 ±20) U/L,(5.1 ±0.5) mmol/L vs (6.8 ± 0.6) mmol/L,(10.6±1.6) mmol/L vs (13.6±1.3) mmol/L,(2.85 ±0.28) vs (2.18 ±0.11),(119 ± 11) g/L vs (90 ±9) g/L] (P 〈0.05).Conclusion Shuxuetong injection combined with MP chemotherapy regimen can reduce the blood viscosity and improve renal function in patients with MM.
出处 《中国医药》 2015年第9期1327-1329,共3页 China Medicine
关键词 多发性骨髓瘤 疏血通注射液 血液流变学 肾功能 Multiple myeloma Shuxuetong injection Blood rheology Renal function
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献66

  • 1王振义.白血病靶向治疗的应用[J].中国实用内科杂志,2005,25(6):500-503. 被引量:6
  • 2李淑兰,谢桂芹,弭晓菊,曲竞南.地龙降压作用的研究[J].中医药信息,1995,12(3):22-24. 被引量:42
  • 3陈斌艳,张蕾,虞礼敏,王竞,王永铭.地龙粉剂对小鼠、大鼠与兔的镇痛解热作用[J].上海医科大学学报,1996,23(3):225-226. 被引量:28
  • 4法祥光 甘午君 等.红细胞膜流动性的测定及其初步应用[J].中华血液学杂志,1984,5(2):132-132.
  • 5石琳 秦正红 等.用荧光偏振技术研究3,4-二羟基苯乙酮对血小板膜流动性影响[J].中国药理学报,1986,7(2):42-42.
  • 6王宇中.医药信息检索[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社,1999..
  • 7Saff MW. Allegra CJ, Greenberg B. Bleeding diathesis in multiple myeloma[J] .J Hemarother Stem Call Res,2001,10(5):657 ~ 660.
  • 8Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN, et al. Predictors of survival after deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population - based cohort study [ J ]. Arch Intern Med, 1999, 159(5):445-453.
  • 9Lopez JA, Kearon C, Lee AY. Deep venous thrombosis [ J ]. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program, 2004, 439-456.
  • 10Ageno W, Squizzato A, Garcia D, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of venous thromboembolism [ J ]. Semin Thromb Hemost, 2006, 32 (7) : 651-658.

共引文献289

同被引文献77

  • 1蒋翔宁,陈俊峰,汪勇.血清游离轻链κ/λ比值联合免疫固定电泳在多发性骨髓瘤患者预后评估中的价值[J].中国实验血液学杂志,2020,28(1):191-195. 被引量:15
  • 2唐雪娟,任莉.低剂量沙利度胺联合常规化疗治疗多发性骨髓瘤的临床分析[J].中国生化药物杂志,2014,34(4):113-115. 被引量:21
  • 3Manochakian R, Miller KC, Chanan-Khan AA. Clinical impact of bortezomib in frontline regimens for patients with multiple myeloma[J]. Oncologist, 2007,12 (8) :978-990. DOI : 10. 1634/theoncologist. 12 -8 -978.
  • 4Boyle P, Ferlay J. Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 2004[ J]. Ann Oncol, 2005,16(3) :481-488. DOI: 10. 1093/an- nonc/mdi098.
  • 5Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2007 [ J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2007,57 ( 1 ) :43-66. DOI : 10. 3322/Canjclin. 57.1.43.
  • 6Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk strati- fication and response assessment of multiple myeloma [ J ]. Leuke- mia, 2009,23 ( 1 ) :3-9. DOI : 10. 1038/leu. 2008. 291.
  • 7Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, et al. Reporting results of cancer treatment[J]. Cancer, 1981,47 ( 1 ) :207-214. DOI: 10. 1002/1097-0142( 19810101 )47 : 1 <207 : :AID-CNCR2820470134 > 3.0. C0;2-6.
  • 8Richardson PG, Sonneveld P, Schuster MW, et al. Bortezomib or high-dose dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma [ J]. N Engl J Med, 2005,352 (24) : 2487-2498. DOI: 10. 1056/NEJ- Moa043445.
  • 9San Miguel JF, Schlag R, Khuageva NK, et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma[ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2008,359(9):906-917.
  • 10Jagannath S, Durie BG, Wolf J, et al. Bortezomib therapy alone and in combination with dexamethasone for previously untreated symptomatic muhiple myeloma[ J ]. Br J Haematol, 2005,129 (6) : 776-783.

引证文献8

二级引证文献91

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部