摘要
随着我国政府信息公开的深入推进,行政知情权逐步衍生出政府信息公开请求权和卷宗阅览权两种不同类型的具体权利。在司法个案与司法解释的共同作用下,卷宗阅览权得以具象化。与政府信息公开请求权不同,卷宗阅览权在我国尚缺乏完善的法律保障制度。通过有效的法律创设机制对卷宗阅览权加以确认和规范,具有重要的现实意义。卷宗阅览权司法救济的困境,反映了"重实体、轻程序"的传统立场。在我国特定的法治背景下,引入预防性行政诉讼机制可以有效实现卷宗阅览权的司法保障。
With the deep propel of the disclosure of government information in China, the two specific fights, the fight to claim the disclosure of government information and the fight of reading dossier, gradually derive from the right to know in administra- tion. The combined effect of the judicial case and judicial interpretations make the right of reading dossier reifiable. Different from the fight to claim the disclosure of government information, there is still no perfect legal protection system of the right of reading dossier now. The legal confirmation of the right of reading dossier has the important practical significance. The judicial remedy dilemma of the fight of reading dossier reflects the traditional standpoint of regarding substantiality and depreciating procedure. In the specific context of the rule of law in China, the introducing of preventive administrative litigation can realizing the judicial guarantee of the right of reading dossier effectively.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第5期51-57,共7页
Legal Forum
关键词
行政知情权
卷宗阅览权
法律确认
司法救济
the right to know in administration
the right of reading dossier
legal confirmation
judicial remedy