期刊文献+

中文版感知健康能力量表在肝移植人群中的信度、效度研究 被引量:9

The reliability and validity of the chinese version of Perceived Health Competence Scale among liver transplant recipients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :检验中文版感知健康能力量表(PHCS)在肝移植人群中的信度和效度。方法 :采取Brislin翻译模式对PHCS进行汉化,对221例肝移植受者进行调查,检测量表的信度、效度。结果 :中文版PHCS总量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.802,两个维度(行为期望和结果期望)的Cronbach’sα系数分别为0.786、0.769;重测信度系数为0.709;量表平均S-CVI为0.95。采用因子分析析取的2个公因子,共同解释了60.825%的总方差。PHCS与PCS及MCS的相关系数rs分别为0.255、0.570,P<0.01。PHCS与MCMQ面对应对呈正相关(rs=0.173,P<0.01),与回避应对(rs=-0.134,P<0.05)和屈服应对(rs=-0.575,P<0.01)呈负相关,进一步验证了量表的结构效度。结论 :PHCS中文版在肝移植受者中证实了有较好的信度、效度,可以用于评估肝移植受者的健康自我效能。 Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Perceived Health Competence Scale(PHCS) among liver transplant recipients. Methods: The english version of PHCS was translated into chinese according to Brislin translation model. The reliability and validity of Chinese version of PHCS were tested in 221 liver transplant recipients. Results: The Cronbach's α of the total scale and its two subscales were 0.802, 0.786 and 0.769 separately. The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.709. The average content validity index was 0.95 for the total scale. Two factors were extracted by factor analysis, which contributed 60.825% of the variance. The perceived health competence showed positive correlation with PCS(rs=0.255, P〈0.01), MCS(rs=0.570, P〈0.01) and confrontation(rs=0.173, P〈0.01), and showed negative correlation with avoidance(rs=-0.134, P〈0.05) and acceptance-resignation(rs=-0.575, P〈0.01). Conclusion: The reliability and validity of Chinese version of PHCS in liver transplant recipients are acceptable, so it could be used to assess the self-efficacy of health management in Chinese liver transplant recipients.
出处 《中国护理管理》 CSCD 2015年第9期1067-1070,共4页 Chinese Nursing Management
基金 北京市自然科学基金(7142098)
关键词 肝移植 自我效能 信度 效度 liver transplantation self-efficacy reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Mendes KD,Galvato CM.Liver transplantation: evidence for nursing care.Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem,2008,16(5):915-922.
  • 2Bandura A,Bussey K.On broadening the cognitive,motivational,and sociostructural scope of theorizing about gender development and functioning: comment on Martin,Ruble,and Szkrybalo (2002). Psychological Bulletin,2004,130(5):691-701.
  • 3Ovaskainen ML,Tapanainen H,Laatikainen T, et al. Perceived health-related self-efficacy associated with BMI in adults in a population-based survey.Scandinavian journal of public health,2015,43(2):197-203.
  • 4Bandura A.Self-efficacy towards a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological review,1977,84(2): 191-215.
  • 5万巧琴,刘燕,王志稳.结肠造口病人一般自我效能与应对方式研究[J].护理研究(上旬版),2010,24(5):1144-1146. 被引量:13
  • 6Dal Sasso-Mendes K,da Costa Ziviani L, Rossin FM, et al. Perceived self-efficacy among liver transplant candidates and recipients. Gastroenterology Nursing,2011,34(3):236-241.
  • 7李佳宁,郭霞,郝正玮,吕志伟,赵雅宁.自我效能干预对养老院老年人生活质量及心境状态的影响[J].护理学报,2015,22(7):68-71. 被引量:8
  • 8Smith MS,Wallston KA,Smith CA.The development and validation of the Perceived Health Competence Scale.Health Education Research,1995, 10(1):51-64.
  • 9Smim MS.Growing health nuts:preventive health behavior of young adults as a function of perceived control,relative health value and susceptibility beliefs. NashvilleNandethilt University,1988.
  • 10Smith CA,Wallston KA.Adaptation in patients with chronic rheumatoid arthritis:application of a general model.Health Psychology,1992(11):151-162.

二级参考文献80

共引文献6295

同被引文献94

引证文献9

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部