期刊文献+

美国媒体视野中的民事诉讼 被引量:1

Civil Litigation in the Eyes of US Media
原文传递
导出
摘要 媒体对民事诉讼制度具有强大的影响力,它不仅影响特定情况下民事诉讼裁判的作出,也影响更广泛的民事诉讼制度,因为媒体的报道影响民事诉讼中不同参与者决定的作出。本文探讨媒体对民事诉讼所作报道的本质,公众和法律从业者对民事诉讼制度的看法,以及媒体报道对于陪审团成员、法官、民事诉讼当事人和政策决策者在作出有关决定时的潜在影响。总体而言,该研究表明,目前美国媒体对民事诉讼的报道大多都曲解了事实,并在不同角度影响了人们对民事诉讼制度的认识,也影响了民事诉讼结果的作出。然而,现有的研究仍有很多空白需要填补。 The news media have the potential to act as a powerful influence on the civil litigation system, influencing decision making in particular cases and on the system more generally as media re- ports influence the decision making of various participants in the system. This paper discusses the nature of media reporting on civil litigation, perceptions of the civil litigation system held by the public and le- gal actors, and the potential influence of news reporting about civil litigation on the decision making of jurors, judges, civil litigants, and policymakers. Overall, the research suggests that news reporting of civil litigation present a systematically distorted picture of civil litigation and that this reporting can influ- ence perceptions and outcomes of civil litigation in various ways. However, there are many gaps in the existing research that need to be filled.
作者 吴如巧
机构地区 重庆大学法学院
出处 《比较法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期190-200,共11页 Journal of Comparative Law
基金 重庆大学"中央高校基本科研业务费重点项目"(编号:CQDXWL-2013-Z021) 重庆大学"自主科研重点项目"(编号:CDJSK 11013)的阶段性成果
关键词 媒体 民事诉讼 扭曲 影响 media civil litigation distortion affect
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1S. Daniels & J. Martin, Civil Juries and the Politics of Reform (Northwestern University Press 1995 ).
  • 2D. L. Rhode, A Bad Press on Bad Lawyers : The Media Sees Research, Research Sees the Media, in Social Science, Social Policy, and the Law 139 -169 (P. Ewick, R. A. Kagan & A. Sarat eds. , Russell Sage Foundation 1999).
  • 3L. Wilkins & P. Patterson, Risk Analysis and the Coastruction of News, 37 Journal of Communication 80 -92 (1987).
  • 4D. S. Bailis & R. J. MacCoun, Estimating Liability Risks with the Media as Your Guide: A Content Analysis of Media Coverage of Tort Litigation, 20 Law and Human Behavior 419 -429 (1996).
  • 5S. Garber, Product Liability, Punitive Damages, Business Decisions, and Economic Outcomes, 1998 Wisconsin Law Review 237 - 295.
  • 6O. G. Chase, Helping Jurors Determine Pain and Suffering Awards, 23 Hofstra Law Review 763 -790 (1995). Danicls & Martin, supra note 1, at 34.
  • 7Bailis & MacCoun, supra note 4, at 420.
  • 8S. Daniels & J. Martin, Punitive Damages, Change, and the Politics of Ideas : Defining Public Policy Problem, 1998.
  • 9Wisconsin Law Review 77. N. R. Feigenson & D. S. Bailis, Air Bag Safety: Media Coverage, Popular Conceptions, and Public Policy, 7 Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 444 -481 (2001).
  • 10F. L. Cook et al. , Media and Agenda Setting: Effects on the Public, Interest Group Leaders, Policy Makers, and Policy, 47 Public Opinion Quarterly 16 - 35 (1983).

同被引文献13

  • 1中央纪委法规室、监察部法规司编译:《国外防治腐败与公职人员财产申报法律选编》,中国方正出版社2012年版.
  • 2房宁、周少来:《国外公职人员财产申报与公示制度的经验与启示》,中国社会科学院“政治发展比较研究”课题组编著:《国外公职人员财产申报与公示制度》,中国社会科学出版社2013年版,第3页.
  • 3洪若琳.《粤官"晒财":期待突破》.《民主与法制时报》2012年5月21日.
  • 4SEC.205-206,PUBLICLAW95-521--OCT.26,1978.92STAT.1846-1847.
  • 5胡振良、杨清清、刘晨.《法国政治生活财务畸督制度》.房宁主编.《国外公职人选财产申报与公示制度》,中国社会科学出版社2013年版,第44-45页.
  • 6房宁主编.《国外公职入选财产申报与公示制度》,中国社会科学出版社2013年版,第52页.
  • 7石东坡.行政行为及其特征的再探讨[J].法学论坛,2000,15(1):51-56. 被引量:5
  • 8王贵松.论行政裁量的司法审查强度[J].法商研究,2012,29(4):66-76. 被引量:55
  • 9王高贺,郭文亮.官员财产公示要稳步推进——基于官员财产公示风险评估的视角[J].理论探索,2015(1):59-63. 被引量:2
  • 10胡杰.论官员的容忍义务[J].法学,2015(8):146-152. 被引量:5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部