摘要
目的:评价冠状动脉CT造影(CCTA)诊断不同类型的冠状动脉粥样斑块所致冠状动脉狭窄的价值与限度。方法:连续80例完成CCTA及侵入性冠状动脉造影(ICA)检查的疑诊冠状动脉狭窄患者(男性62例,女性18例,年龄30-77岁,平均58岁)纳入研究,冠状动脉粥样斑块类型分为钙化性、非钙化性和混合性。以冠状动脉节段为单位,以ICA结果为金标准,运用相关分析及Bland-Altman分析评价2种检查技术诊断三种斑块所致冠状动脉狭窄的一致性。结果:最终诊断明显冠脉狭窄(狭窄程度≥50%)49例108个节段;两种技术诊断钙化斑块性冠状动脉明显狭窄一致性差(r=0.720,P〈0.01),非钙化和混合斑块性明显狭窄一致性良好(r=0.895,r=0.900,P〈0.01)。结论:CCTA诊断非钙化性和混合性斑块所致冠状动脉狭窄准确性较好,钙化斑块性狭窄的诊断需慎重.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the value and limit of coronary CT angiography in detecting coronary stenosis with three types of coronary atherosclerotic plaques. Methods: Eighty patients underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and invasive coronary angiography (/CA) were included in the study. Coronary artery plaques were classified as calcified, non-calcified and mixed plaques based on CCTA. Results: For calcified plaques, quantitative coronary stenosis analysis revealed a poor agreement between CCTA and ICA (r = 0.72). For non-calcified and mixed plaques, quantitative coronary stenosis analysis revealed a good agreement between CCTA and ICA (r = 0.895, r = 0.900, respectively). Conclusion: CCTA has good accucary in diagnosis of coronary stenosis caused by non-calcified and mixed plaques. An initial unenhanced scan to evaluate the presence of extensive calcium could avoid suboptimal CCTA in patients with severe calcifications.
出处
《中国医学计算机成像杂志》
CSCD
北大核心
2015年第4期326-330,共5页
Chinese Computed Medical Imaging
基金
新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金No.2013211A083
新疆乌鲁木齐市科学技术计划项目No.Y121320019
新疆医科大学一附院自然基金No.2013ZRZD12~~